Feynman makes a Bedini Motor

[PMM Dave]

A "newbie" with extraordinary knowledge and tons of experience at building these devices, is yet again "stirring the pot"

Guys, how many times do I have to say this? I make NO CLAIMS one way or the other about my levels of knowledge, experience or education!!! How hard can it be to grasp this simple concept?

I guess I should also add that I ain't telling whether I work for the oil companies or any kind of intelligence operation either!

Honestly, what part of "NO CLAIMS" do you not understand

[Groundloop]

@Evil Roy Slade,

>>Firstly, I will decide what questions I wish to pose.

It was a matter of speak. English is not my first language. I will defend your rights to free speech with my life,
and you can pose all the questions you like. Did you not see the smiley at the end of the sentence?

>>OU is NOT proven. Never has, anywhere. Please quote a source for such a remarkable statement.

Now here is the main problem. If I said to you that I have seen o/u two times during my 8 years research,
would you believe me? I do not think so. Because the research done by ordinary people is under documented
and not peer reviewed. A YouTube video will never be proof enough, neither will a post in this forum. How it is
possible to quote a source from a non-exsisting source?

Groundloop

[Evil Roy Slade]

@Groundloop

You are correct in saying that I would not believe you. But thats not because I don't like you, or any other personal reason. In fact you seem a very decent person.

My request for evidence of the OU claim, or any other, would be the same if your name was Steven Hawking or Albert Fert.

In this case the focal point is Mr Bedini. I see no reason to exempt him from the obligation to provide evidence.

Science is based on evidence. It is religion that is based on belief.

Don't get me wrong, I am all for encouraging people to have ideas and theories not matter how outlandish. I have had lots of ideas that seemed to be great at the time but turned out to be 'dogs'. Once the reality hits that the overwhelming evidence does not support the underlying theory one must accept it and move on.

A rehash of a well known Donald Trump saying that I often use is:

It's not personal, it's just science.

ERS

[Groundloop]

@Evil Roy Slade,

>>I see no reason to exempt him from the obligation to provide evidence.
>>Science is based on evidence. It is religion that is based on belief.

Well, I'm a kind of super skeptic myself. :-) But I do try out different ideas
and estimate that there is a possibility to extract power from ambient
heat or electromagnetic radiation. I reckoned that along the way of testing
different electronic circuits I will pick up new ideas and can use those
ideas in circuits that will at least reduce the amount of energy we use.

I do not think that man fully understand all of the secrets in our universe.
The main reason for this is that math is such a poor tool to explain
everything in all dimensions. But math is the only tool we have and I guess
we are stuck with math for a long time. Math can give answers to many
situations but can never predict in advance the existence of over unity.

Take nonlinear circuits. In those circuits most math is a bad tool. In
one instance you have you oscillation going and in the next some unknown
factor detune you circuit. Think of a power oscillator and the input will try to tune
itself away from the best power transfer point when you load the output. Non
linear circuits is a pain in the a.. to work on but when you get everything right
then the reward is a circuit that spend a very little energy on heat. (I'm not
talking about switch mode supplies.) Another field that need some research
is transmittion line (delay line) circuits that use Soliton waves. So far, I
have found in my research some very promising result with such circuits.

What I'm trying to say here is that we must aim high, do the practical research and
along the way who knows what will be discovered. A good starting point is indeed
a Bedini motor and battery charger. We can not just play around in a math world and
say, no, this can't work or this is impossible. Only hard work and real circuits will
provide the truth as nature will show us. And, it is really fun to create something. :-)

Groundloop

[WilbyInebriated]

In this case the focal point is Mr Bedini. I see no reason to exempt him from the obligation to provide evidence.

Science is based on evidence. It is religion that is based on belief.

so, do you, being scientific and all have some sort of evidence to provide as to whether or not john bedini made such claims? since you seem to think he has some sort of obligation to you...

it's not personal, it's just science.