Roll on the 20th June

[chrisC]

Ya, I know I can be cocky, and sometimes a flat out arrogant prick.....

-PurePower

Well said. I think you summed yourself up very well.

cheers
chrisC

[purepower]

No body presses a switch, let alone constructs the the controls for the winch to be done from ground level.

This is why I tried to simplify this with the simplest winch.

You still like trying to craft reality to your views, and politics is looking for YOU! (I said the same thing about Special K).

Electric winch = electric motor, gear reduction assembly, ratcheted spool with steel cable ending in a hook.
Give me the money and physical parameters, TOOLS, and time and I can build it.

This is NOT HARD. But I find it a greater leverage of my TIME to buy a pre-engineered one as the components prices I have to pay are much larger (price, shipping, retail wrapping) than a volume consumer.

Yeah, that's easy. You, an engineering student can't do this?
(Fortune 500 company I'm happy to NOT have stock in! )

After you disregarding my questions or parameters, you expect me to follow yours?
Boy, you are soooooo full of yourself,

But if it takes as much energy to make a winch as to make a pulley, you already have FE and you should SHARE!

Tell me, be honest, you really about 9 years old.

And when did he we all go to bizarro world where all building cost became the same?

So nice you signed it twice?

I'm dodging nothing here.

Dance monkey, dance.

Um, I'm pretty sure your the dancing monkey because

YOU STILL HAVENT ANSWERED THE FUCKING QUESTION.

Same winch, same control box with a nice long cord so you can control it from where ever the fuck you want to be.

Obviously your baked brain can't handle so many things at once, so let me make this simple for you:

Two rigs with some electric lifting mechanism. Construction energy is identical, except one includes additional energy for a pulley. User operation is identical. The system with the pulley has a greater load due to friction.

EVERYTHING IDENTICAL, except greater construction AND operation for the pulley.

Explain. Your whole stance is that I haven been looking at the big picture, but now you are here nit-picking your way out.

Greater construction energy AND operation energy. Busted clown.

"Dance Monkey"

Oh, and I went back to read your insults and found them rather ironic. You accuse me of being childish, yet you are the first to use insults! And you're supposed to be a father! Ha! Great roll model, smoking doobies and wasting time looking like a fool picking fights with a kid half your age online. How much time have you spent on this forum? I wonder how many valuable life lessons your daughter missed out on as a result...

-PurePower

[exxcomm0n]

Exxoconman, there is too much bullshit here to sift through, what the frak are you talking about?

What is the fraud?

I like giving people pet names...and I finally gave you the one I thought of long ago.

You, PureP, and Rusty building a whee of a FE device that doesn't violate Newton in a legalistic way, or any other.

Are you as unable to read and process information as PureP?

I ain't using your shop crafting services either.

[exxcomm0n]

Um, I'm pretty sure your the dancing monkey because

YOU STILL HAVENT ANSWERED THE FUCKING QUESTION.

Same winch, same control box with a nice long cord so you can control it from where ever the fuck you want to be.

Obviously your baked brain can't handle so many things at once, so let me make this simple for you:

Two rigs with some electric lifting mechanism. Construction energy is identical, except one includes additional energy for a pulley. User operation is identical. The system with the pulley has a greater load due to friction.

EVERYTHING IDENTICAL, except greater construction AND operation for the pulley.

Explain. Your whole stance is that I haven been looking at the big picture, but now you are here nit-picking your way out.

Greater construction energy AND operation energy. Busted clown.

"Dance Monkey"

Oh, and I went back to read your insults and found them rather ironic. You accuse me of being childish, yet you are the first to use insults! And you're supposed to be a father! Ha! Great roll model, smoking doobies and wasting time looking like a fool picking fights with a kid half your age online. How much time have you spent on this forum? I wonder how many valuable life lessons your daughter missed out on as a result...

-PurePower

Shes seems to excel in spite of that.

It's gotta be genetic.

It's late and I'm tired and you're no longer entertaining enough.

Nite nite

If you wanted everyone to use your pet word, why didn't you just say so?

[purepower]

Shes seems to excel in spite of that.

It's gotta be genetic.

It's late and I'm tired and you're no longer entertaining enough.

Nite nite

If you wanted everyone to use your pet word, why didn't you just say so?

Genetic? Then she must get it from her mother...

Still no answer. Tail between your legs. Damn that was fun!

And what is this "not entertaining enough" shit? Has all this just been a game to you? I thought you were here to help, not diddle yourself for kicks!

I'd like to say "you remind me of myself at age <5,6,7>," but thankfully I was never that pathetic...

-PurePower