Roll on the 20th June

[Rusty_Springs]

yes you have a magnet that is the same as one of mine, wow you litle inventor you, oh and you have mags side by side wonderful, just like in a motor, but polarity spacing and having the correct power levels between the track and the driver are what makes a mayernik array, not a rope chain making a ring magnet, that has been around for years in all three forms, not making a ring is formost, in fact surprising rusty did not point that out to you (it was one of his big issues) you two should get together, you could lay magnets out in lots of patterns, and everytime and engineer invents something that has a simialr look, you can claim inventor status coz ladies, that is the only way you will ever achive anything.

and as for rusty, the mag train also has ploes either side of the roller just like yours and just like yours they are at right angles to the roller. so your is exactly the same as the mag train which has been around for a couple of years.

perpendicular field rusty, look it up sometime. that means they are different to parralel, you should look that up also. But only parallel fields will run vertcial over over the loop and yours will not.

as for rusty say it went up and over, the video links shows it did the whole time you pushed it. exceptional. Should i repost your bio for everyone to see who has missed it?

In any event this is my last response to either of you, and with those that read ghys claim of previous loops then see his posts from the last 3 weeks, then backpeddaling down to doesn't it at least look the same, and rusty who simply does not understand anything about magnetic fields, thinking that parallel fields are the same as perpenduicular fields, showing his less than grade 5 knowledge of engineering, and that perpendicular field mag trains have been around for years like the one i have linked on the site, that actually work better than his own.  I am sure many others will join me in not even reading any more of your post and ignoring the fact you are even here.

Same old claims without any proof nothing new here, two new invisible members. I shall add a signiture that has all the invisible members who should be ignored.

I would love it if you didn't respond to what I have to say because you only talk dribble and havn't got a clue, what you do or say doesn't interest me so you and your lackies can say and do what they like all I'm interested in are the newbies so I give them hands on experiments to see for them sleves, no need to show videos just let them experiment and see whats right then they can make up there own minds.

[Rusty_Springs]

I enjoyed reading the bit at the bottom of your post Archer but I have one question and thats what have you invented that works?

[X00013]

Hi X00
Two things theres a magnetic attraction before your rod is even in place so ofcause the rod would have to come in closer once that magnetic attraction is taken away and second as was pointed out it takes alot of force to switch it on and off.
Take Care X00
Graham

@Rusty,  I was just trying to demonstrate what Archer did, I personnal consider my efforts to be a "consumer reports" type. Exx , my rep!!, help me out

[therealrasta]

@Rusty,  I was just trying to demonstrate what Archer did, I personnal consider my efforts to be a "consumer reports" type. Exx , my rep!!, help me out

I'm down.. That was a good show.. Thanks for sharing.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

Ok today seems like a good day for a new video  hhhmm but which one.

I think a world of machines running is a tad more important than my own ego, so i will post a gate video today just to help everyone see what i mean regarding configuration.

It will of course have to pull a magnet that is on a track magnet, what else? it really would be best if there was no contact simply passing fields, that would should proof of automation.

But the again it may show nothing new.

so instead of after the event, lets get this sorted before hand, standard large neos i use in a pair as i use, them moved from a set of standard track magnets as you have seen me use, it is stuck to the magnets as it norammly would be , with only fields passing and no contact.

remember also there is no momentum to help this magnet move it must break free from stationary so is in essence a test showing far greater power than required.

if this has been done before, there is no need to show it, if it is not new there is no need to show it, if it does not prove anything there is no need to show it.

I will wait until the end of the day for anyone to make such a claim as the above with proof, and naturally we shall deem any late zero proof entries of such claims as a new member to the invisibles team.

From now on, no prisoners and absolution in crushing known limits with prior claims given the opportunity of proof in advance.

again well done X00013

Have to go.