Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

A whole nuther slew of shite.

The point was - the answer requires numbers (or a fully working device to prove the principal)

@ cap'n

No bro, the point is the machine will never care about the numbers. Sometime much farther down the road they'll probably come in handy, but I'll still probably fuck it up and say that the pull strength is worth 1 goat, and a goitered chicken.

I like ya man, but I am still not doing this for you.
I don't have to, I didn't promise anything to anyone except long lasting disdain for PureP.

Speaking of which.....................

Exx-
Isn't it kinda important to know the answer to the 3 eqs question?
I mean, one results in underunity, one in overunity, and one just unity?
Wouldn't you like to know before 30 of your pets start building?
-PurePower

@ PureP

Not for me, not right now. I was seeing if it "worked as advertised".

(Oh good, now I'm a cat lady.)
When did I become responsible for what people put their hand to?
When did I become the Pied Piper of Hamlin?

For that matter, when did you think my opinion of you and or your content was of any interest or different emotion than I expressed last time?

Next!

@ chap

Pretty much dude.
The only time that magnetics are dangerous to a hard drive is during write procedures when it can:
a.) influence the electromagnetic write to the platter
and
b.) prevent the inner positioning assem. from aligning the write head appropriately during that function

....otherwise hard drives don't care about magnetism. The only way to truly make sure that data cannot be retrieved is fire (like the heating of a neo ) and physical destruction with (my favorite), a maul.

<snip>
@ exx, (my rep, checks in the mail)    i did what u did, the only diference is i took my camera off of "record in stoned big blocks" setting, 

Then why can't you answer their questions and get 'em to stop bugging me?

You at least took time to make a reference mark on the plywood.

I don't care what people think of my tools or methods, got the job done, didn't it?
<see top for the job>

P.S. Def Leppard???


@ Archer

They asked for it, they got it in the way I wanted to proffer it. I'm not driving 40 mi. to get the DVD camera only, so they'll have to suck it up or refrain from interest.

If you want to point to american stupidity, all it takes is 3 letters

W.M.D.

@ Rast

True bud, but "we" let them do it (Not to say there hasn't been opinion for a LONG time that elections were anything but popular vote!)

Look kids,

You start paying me to do your experiments (not that I'm asking), or DIY.
Don't expect anything I do to be to your specifications unless that was the agreed upon end at the beginning.

Now go fetch me a turkey pot pie!
(as an example of how I see the insight into the janky webcam vid)

[capthook]

as to captain hook, good questions but you seem to have gone off track somewhere, there is only one array for trhe track

Yes - 1 overall array and very many small arrays (each stack) that are combined to make the large array.  I guess I don't know what to call these small arrays to convey my message. Spokes?  Strings?

the ferrite replaces the last setion of track/array

So as to overcome the wall.  Well.... now there is a wall 1 section (array/spoke/string?) back?

it simply bridges a field gap

this is where you must break that back attraction of the "field gap"

I assure you i could not tell when the rod was in the field or was not.

In the video I saw several times where the bolt clanged into the ferrites/steel piece by accident and sticking there indicating a rather large field.

i would say we are in the thousands of times the power of any present field effects.

Thousands? Wow! That is frickin HUGE!  Even if it proves to be a net positive energy event - I would suppose it would be more like .5 to 2 times.  Only further, quantifiable testing can answer that.

[capthook]

@ cap'n

No bro, the point is the machine will never care about the numbers. Sometime much farther down the road they'll probably come in handy, but I'll still probably fuck it up and say that the pull strength is worth 1 goat, and a goitered chicken.

Correct you are.  However - to spend a few hours to KNOW the numbers will prove if it will work.  Rather than ' f ' number of days and ' g ' number of $$ to build it to see.
(let's see.... 4+ months and counting?)

And the numbers will help understand what it's doing

[therealrasta]

@GWHY

Here is another way I invision it.. The rod is not on the wheel but instead mounted to the ferrite at all times on the rim of the outside mag track holder but is elevated out of the influence of all mags except the ferrite and the and banked magnetic force in neo that make the bridge when near contact (which contact never happens). Excuse my crappy image.. Just did it real fast to provide a visual aid to my rant.



Hey PP.. Ignore this post please as I used the word banked.. 

[Rusty_Springs]

@Graham, do you have test results (push/pull) with specialized equipement u could post in any config?

Hi X00
I can't see there was much wrong with the way you experimented except you didn't take into account the flux reach from the ferrite before the wand was brought in.
Take Care X00
Graham