Roll on the 20th June

[shakman]

Hi Cap
You were totally right and have been all along just people can't see the logic.
One more thing people don't take into acount and thats magnets flow from the middle of each pole in two direction so if you have a same pole magnet comming towards another magnet the magnetic flux comes out from the middle in one direction pushing the other magnet away but if that other magnet passes the middle then the magnets flux moves in the opposite direction pushing the moving magnet out.
Now say your magnetic current is setup to repel a incomming magnet as the magnet roller moves in its setup to turn the current on and because the roller is not in the middle of the magnetic flux when the current is turned on the roller will be pushed away and in the opposite direction to what you want it travelling, it needs to past the half way point of the ferrite before it gets pushed in the direction you want it to more and its the opposite if your using attracting magnet it will attract to the middle and then attract back past the middle so comming in it goes in the direction you want and going out it goes in the opposite direction you want.
This is easy to test get two magnets and bring one into the other from the right side and then the left side you will see that if attracting both sides will pull into the middle and if repelling your will see that both side push out from the middle.
Take Care Cap and all
Graham

Alright, last post before I go to bed...

@Graham

Despite my inexperience building mechanical devices from scratch, even I caught on to the fact that the idea of the switch is that the ferrite is "boosted" temporarily. What you've just described is not the use of the switch, you've described a magnet that is using a constant pulling force. It does not take a genius to figure out where Archer is going with this and your last post is waaaay off the mark. I say this to you confidently, regardless of the fact that you possibly have far superior knowledge of magnets than me, not because what you have said is wrong, but purely because it does not at all apply to what Archer has demonstration and the implementation everyone else around here aside from a select few are discussing. I'm not pointing fingers, but you're one of the 'select few', and membership to that club is dwindling as more people begin to see the potential of these ideas.

Whether you like Archer or not Graham, let's stick to discussing what the rest of the thread is discussing. Going off on your own tangent is paramount to hijacking the thread. Even if what you are saying is highly intelligent, it just makes you look dim when you apply it in the wrong context.

shakman

[exxcomm0n]

@ all (since I'm waxing philosophical @ the moment about some recent assumptions about me)

Look kids,

I'm not in this to be a co-conspiritor, or henchman/bouncer, or follower, or skeptic.

The only thing I try to come here thinking is that "I know I don't know, and can never really know; but you guys have some neat toys and I'm going to build some of them to see if they work like you said!"

Radiant Fairy and PureP seem to think I'm a right hand man of Archers, if not a force of mental nefariousness equal to what they say his is.

Flattering to say the least, but more interesting and true things whistle from my ass the day after a meal with baked beans.

I'm just a guy that is to be pitied and shunned due to my chemical dependencies according to mass popular opinion.

I groove on that as shunning is one step closer to my preferred stance of "Leave me the fuck alone".

Now if they could only do it correctly.

[Rusty_Springs]

Alright, last post before I go to bed...

@Graham

Despite my inexperience building mechanical devices from scratch, even I caught on to the fact that the idea of the switch is that the ferrite is "boosted" temporarily. What you've just described is not the use of the switch, you've described a magnet that is using a constant pulling force. It does not take a genius to figure out where Archer is going with this and your last post is waaaay off the mark. I say this to you confidently, regardless of the fact that you possibly have far superior knowledge of magnets than me, not because what you have said is wrong, but purely because it does not at all apply to what Archer has demonstration and the implementation everyone else around here aside from a select few are discussing. I'm not pointing fingers, but you're one of the 'select few', and membership to that club is dwindling as more people begin to see the potential of these ideas.

Whether you like Archer or not Graham, let's stick to discussing what the rest of the thread is discussing. Going off on your own tangent is paramount to hijacking the thread. Even if what you are saying is highly intelligent, it just makes you look dim when you apply it in the wrong context.

shakman

Hi Shak
So what your saying is Archer is not turning the ferrite into a stronger magnet or the iso ferrite into a magnet because if hes not then what I just said is no relevant but I'm pretty sure the magnetic current is to turn a magnet on and off and if thats true then it reacts like any other magnet making what I say very relevant.
Take Care Shak
Graham

[X00013]

@ Archer, trust me, we all hear u

@ Rusty, thnxs 4 reply, i just thot u mite have sumting other than words typed, i respect u as well Archer.

@exx and All, I dedicate my intro song on my next video to Exx.

[redriderno22]

All i can say is WOW

still fighting

still arguing

but nothing has been done?

no one has reproduced a working wheel?

I'm going back to work.......