Roll on the 20th June

[g4macdad]

@ Xav

Mathematical differentials are not my forte dude, but I've given it a look.

You'll have to give me some time though as I'll have to process the info you've given as well as that from his site (the popups are really bad on a tripod site) so it'll take me a while to build the fortitude necessary to fully investigate the ideas.

I will, it'll just take me longer than most.

@ all

I'm rather surprised that my response to g4 has not accrued more responses, but then again it's hard to debate the factuality of historically recorded content, eh?

If you think "major party" candidates are going to save the US financial future, you're right!

Just don't expect them to be doing it for the american citizen instead of multinational businesses  as voting track records will tell no matter what they say, it is not their highest priority.

Comments, rebuttals, and opposing insights welcome.

On the device side of things, I'm still of a mind that there's something in there, somewhere.
I'm having an idea using solenoid tubes, the Mondrasek flipper switch, and Mke arrays.
But I still have to experiment to see if there is anything to them.

The issue I've always had with the wheel is centrifugal force (although I was willing to give Archer the benefit of the doubt that he had addressed this issue) in the way that weight (so far) has always behaved the same when effected with velocity.

I have a few other mental flights of fancy to puzzle out that might make that a moot point (this is why I'm such a big fan of the dirt devil).

Stay tuned....same bat time, same bat channel.

BTW......whatever happened to batman?

@exx
While I did not totally disagree with your statement, it seems you are not being very honest with yourself in this matter. Simply put, if Obama loses McSame wins, and vice versa.

[exxcomm0n]

@exx
While I did not totally disagree with your statement, it seems you are not being very honest with yourself in this matter. Simply put, if Obama loses McSame wins, and vice versa.

@ g4

You're probably right.
But the longer everyone believes that, the longer it will stay true.

I will do my part to show others (if my vote is correctly counted and reported) that there is a growing dissatisfaction with both major parties.

I will never consider a vote to be wasted if it fits the criteria above.

[sky]

For Clarity:

Fuck wasting your vote, Vote 3rd party!!!

[Xaverius]

@ Xav

Mathematical differentials are not my forte dude, but I've given it a look.

You'll have to give me some time though as I'll have to process the info you've given as well as that from his site (the popups are really bad on a tripod site) so it'll take me a while to build the fortitude necessary to fully investigate the ideas.

I will, it'll just take me longer than most.

@ all

I'm rather surprised that my response to g4 has not accrued more responses, but then again it's hard to debate the factuality of historically recorded content, eh?

If you think "major party" candidates are going to save the US financial future, you're right!

Just don't expect them to be doing it for the american citizen instead of multinational businesses  as voting track records will tell no matter what they say, it is not their highest priority.

Comments, rebuttals, and opposing insights welcome.

On the device side of things, I'm still of a mind that there's something in there, somewhere.
I'm having an idea using solenoid tubes, the Mondrasek flipper switch, and Mke arrays.
But I still have to experiment to see if there is anything to them.

The issue I've always had with the wheel is centrifugal force (although I was willing to give Archer the benefit of the doubt that he had addressed this issue) in the way that weight (so far) has always behaved the same when effected with velocity.

I have a few other mental flights of fancy to puzzle out that might make that a moot point (this is why I'm such a big fan of the dirt devil).

Stay tuned....same bat time, same bat channel.

BTW......whatever happened to batman?

@ Exxxcommon, I understand, the numbers can be overwhelming.  The bottom line is that in this example 8 watts of electrical energy can be used to produce enough magnetic force to produce 80 watts of mechanical energy.  That 80 watts of mechanical energy can be used to drive the generator to obtain the 8 watts of electrical energy.  Take your time with it, I know it's a lot of information.  Please realize that this concept can also be used with electromagnetic/solenoid switching of the Mondrasek wheel and solenoid tubes

I am also looking into centrifugal forces for an impulse device that uses force and mass differentials to produce excessive energy through velocity dynamics. Perhaps PurePower could provide some input for that.

Batman promised a neodymium magnetic array and a prime mover which he claimed was overunity.  Perhaps he's too busy battling the Joker.  Batman, come out of the bat cave and present the device.  Could Archer Quinn be the Joker?

Rod Clark's ideas are fascinating but we need more information.  I tried to contact him but no success, if you can contact him, please let me know what he has to say.

No McCain No Obama

[Xaverius]

For Clarity:

Fuck wasting your vote, Vote 3rd party!!!

Damn right!!  A wasted vote is for the Democrats and Republicans.  They are both owned by the same criminals.  The Bankers!!



No Obama No McCain