David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

[Hoppy]

Hoppy,


The link to the schematic we are using is here:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/10610-3-battery-generating-system-78.html#post235538
And it is post 2335 on that page.


Be advised that things may change drastically very shortly. We have learned that reversing the magnetic polarity on a battery SEEMS to turn it into a negative resistor, and it self charges. If you keep a load on it to prevent it from charging, you can continue to pull the flux out of the ambient environment. FOr how long, we don't know yet. So we are focusing on two things...finding a consistent way to flip the magnetic polarity on a battery, and seeing how long this negative resistor will last. Way may only need ONE battery.


Dave

Dave,

Thanks for link to your current experimental battery setup.

I have experimented along the 'reverse polarity' lines and have managed to reverse the polarity of SLA batteries whilst they are loaded and being reverse charged from an SG or Tesla coil setup. I can get them to charge for a while whilst reading reverse polarity but this is only short term, as they always flip back at some point and after a couple or so reversals fail to do so. I'm not sure that it is a genuine charge and may more likely be a desulfation effect. The best candidates I have found are from UPS battery strips that have been replaced under maintenance. These typically contain 8 x 5A/hr 12V AGM SLA's, of which at least one of these has shorted cells. The rest can be quite serviceable with a little re-conditioning.  I have found that the 'bad' batteries are the best candidates for polarity reversal.  I hope you can find a way of using this reverse polarity battery vagary.

PS: The rudeness in post 2970 on your thread over at the Energetic Forum is the prime reason I dislike that forum as this type of post is allowed to persist on the forum without moderation.

[a.king21]

One more time:  Hidden in PLAIN SIGHT:

[a.king21]

Hidden in PLAIN SIGHT:
Tesla's OWN WORDS:

[a.king21]

Another version of Tesla;s overunity earthquake machine:
In Tesla's own words:

[MileHigh]

Look at the quote, "It would only be necessary to step up the vibrations of the machine."

Tesla is just speaking in common sense terms.  Yes you can bring down a building by exiting it at it's resonant frequency.  But you have to put energy in at a rate above some power threshold to bring the building down.  It's not over unity, you are reading something into the text that is not there.  You need to filter out some of the outlandish claims in the articles and decipher the truth, just like you said.  The truth is right there in the articles.

Think of the wine glass again.  If you can sing the resonant note loud enough, the wine glass shatters.  If you are not loud enough, the wine glass will not shatter.

For any resonant system there are the losses in energy when it resonates and there is a breaking point.  You have to pump power in at a sufficient rate to overcome the losses and reach the breaking point.  It could be a wine glass or a building.  There is no over unity here. The power you pump in becomes heat and mechanical vibration.  The mechanical vibration can absorb and accumulate the energy you pump into the system.

There are always two complimentary components that store energy in a resonant system.  What are they for the wine glass?  What are they for the building?  When you explore these questions you can demystify resonance.

You can look at the two components from a bird's eye view and it looks like a spinning vector.  Think of an arrow spinning around on an axis.  They call it a phasor diagram.  An entire resonant system can be described by imagining a phasor rotating at a certain angular velocity.  The "shadow" that the rotating vector makes in the x and y directions describes two sine waves 90 degrees out of phase.  The correspond to the two complimentary components that store energy in a resonant system.

I found a graphic to show that.

MileHigh