David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

[MileHigh]

SeaMonkey:

Your comments with respect to Hoppy's comments about rudeness on your EF thread:

Well said Hoppy!  In fact, it is possible that the
"co-founder/moderator" there encourages such
immature communication.

It's funny how selective we can be, eh?  Do you recall the recent extreme rudeness and immaturity by someone else when we were discussing alleged "chem trails?"  You didn't seem to have any issue with that, no attempt was made by you to discourage it at all, which implies that you passively encouraged it.

MileHigh

[a.king21]

I'm not gonna respond to a-holes

[Farmhand]

I'm not gonna respond to a-holes

Ok fair enough, if that is your opinion of me then so be it, but I still don't know that is the case because you are still being vague even in that response.

What is it you mean by "a-holes" ? And who is the comment directed at ?

Anyway if it is me, then that is your opinion, but please do not try to use your opinion of me to hide behind, or use me as an excuse to avoid the issue and the valid question.

What is it that you are saying is hidden in plain sight ?

.........

Not to A.King.

And for the sake of a random comment. The insulting rhetoric and dismissive comments in the "Poll" thread about chemtrails, in my opinion originated from the side that is now complaining of it.

Here's a suggestion. Lets keep our opinions of each others psychological state to ourselves. Might help not to derail discussions into battles of who is bat crap crazy and who is not. 

.. Just a suggestion.

..

P.S. To others, if A.King refuses to answer the question because I asked it then I respectfully request that some other person also asks for him to answer the question or poses the question themselves to him directly.

.

[bboj]

No reply from A.King, maybe he doesn't know what it is that is hiding in plain sight to be able to explain it.

Anyway I'll leave it up to people to do their own research and find the explanations from Tesla if they like.

Regardless Tesla is not needed to see how it happens, anyone who has done experiments with two Tesla coils as a transmitter-transmission line-receiver would realize that.

Basically in my mind if people do not understand the way the Tesla world energy transmission system was intended to work then they ought to do more study.

I think my sketch in my previous post illustrates it as plain as a nose on a face.

A.King will fail to recognize the truth of the matter so he can do the same thing he did here over and over again, to induce false placed hype.

bboj, The media exited by Tesla's system would be the planet, or more to the point the L and C of the planet. When Tesla says the globe behaves like a conductor he meant it.

The globe behaves like a wire, it has inductance and capacitance and therefore it can be used as a "tank" or resonant energy storage device, this "tank" can be tapped by a receiver, but it only requires the transmitter to set the tank in motion. The energy can then be utilized by a Tesla receiver or by using two ground plates placed far apart so as to utilize the difference in potential between the two points. Using two ground plates and low frequency means the plates need to be a long way apart, even many miles , and this method is or was in fact used.

But using a Tesla receiver the full 1.4 WL distance is tapped in the receiver as it has a full 1/4 WL potential difference across it as long as it is placed at the correct distance and the system is "tuned".

Really it is very simple.

Cheers

Hi. Thanks for the response. I understand the principle of TMT and also the fact that he considers the earth as a conductor, but I allways had a problem with the 3d image of the disturbance. If we talk about the LC than that is an elecrtomagnetic field - an elastic electromagnetic field?

[MileHigh]

Farmhand:

It's not quite as simple as that.  If I say, "The idea of chem trails is nonsensical foolishness" and you believe in chem trails then I am not calling you a nonsensical fool.  I did not attack anyone personally, and I have the right to express my opinion.  I was personally attacked repeatedly and viciously and sometimes rather ridiculously with some crazy and offensive metaphors.  You had nothing to say about that either.

So you have to distinguish between discussing ideas and even the expression lots of derision about them, which is fine, and discussing people and attacking them, which is not fine.  If you believe in something that somebody else does not believe in and they state their opinion, you just have to deal with it in a normal way and and not spiral downwards into some dark cavern.

A.king made some nonsensical comments about Tesla shaking a building with some unknown device that are completely untrue and I said as much.  He is not responding and I don't care.  It's the truth that matters and when people irresponsibly say that resonance is an over unity process sometimes it's worth it to set the record straight and say that it's not an over unity process.  If that prevents some unknowing person from sending money to somebody like Daniel Nunez then so much the better.  That's a small victory for the truth and a victory for the person that did not fritter their money away on a coil for $600 that doesn't do anything remarkable at all.  They can buy a spool of wire at their local electronics store for $8.99 instead and chances are it will outperform the $600 Nunez coil.

MileHigh