I'm not one to get prematurely excited...but can someone explain this

[resonanceman]

I am still  testing

not getting  much

only an additional  .002 V  today

I am  going to my storage  unit ..  I remember    I had  a bigger motor

If I can find it  maybe a can  get a little  better   output





Ironhead

I like your  attitude
It is my  belief that when we find OU  it  will  be  in  the little  quirks that the EE types  have been taught  how to work around . 

This   is a cool  little  quirk ....... it is  disobaying several  " laws " 

I hope we can figure out  what it is  doing and  how to  help it do more of what it is doing .



gary 

[IronHead]

Thank you
With the motor removed as explained in the earlier post that voltage has dropped from 7.85 at last check point to
7.20 . This concludes that the motor or some device similar must be in place via "Cap-Z-ro" drawings. The DC brush motor is to be reinstated immediately with a starting settled voltage of 7.20. We can rule out that this is an effect from the Capacitors and/or copper wire antenna array by way of the connections between Caps alone. In this we must assume that carbon contacts, copper wire coils and a magnetic field must be intact. At least until the process of elimination is applied to this section of the apparatus, The motor itself.   

The next part of this process would be to remove the carbon contacts  or to build a simple copper wire coil with an appropriate fixed permanent magnetic field applied to the coil. This will eliminate the carbon contact element.
So before this takes place I will give the system some time to "charge" back up, using the word charge loosely here.

[MeggerMan]

Dr.Greenthumb,
DC-DC motor is a brushless setup that uses field effect transistors, some logic, stator coils and a permanent magnet that is the rotor.
Wiki explains it in detail here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushless_DC_electric_motor

Ironhead,
Good work!
Could you try placing a meter in series with the battery connect to measure the (current if any) flowing into the battery.
You may need a meter that can measure down to uA.
Its good to see you are getting +ve results too.  I may need to get some bits out to try this too.
I have a Le Mans 240SB (I think) DC motor I could try.
http://www.tamiyaclub.com/showroom_model.asp?cid=45472&sid=11170
The stator windings are very thick so may not be as effective as your setup or Cap-Z-ro's.
[edit]
OK, here is my setup, cannot find the Le Mans motor so I used a 3V motor instead, voltage is climbing at about 1mV per second but there is no current flowing, not that my meter can detect (0.00mA):

[/edit]
Regards
Rob

[FatBird]

@ IronHead:  Great work & process of elimination techniques.  I too think there is reason to continue research on this.

By the way, here is an interesting part of Dr Beardon's book on O.U. that may apply here

THE FINAL SECRET OF FREE ENERGY? Dr. T. E. Bearden (1993)

This paper contains the real secret of tapping the vacuum energy very simply, using almost any source of potential (battery, electrostatic generator a la Swiss electrostatic device (the Testatika), elevated wire wire/250 V/m in the earth/ionosphere potential, etc). The objective is for the moderately technical reader to understand how to build and understand not only a single device, but also hundreds of different kinds of them.

While it is quite simple, the "magic principle" contained in this paper only took me some 30 years to discover.

In other words, here's the iron rule: If you draw current, you kill the bipolarity gate furnishing the potential gradient (source of energy density). In that case, you kill the source. If you do not draw current, you do not kill the bipolarity gate and you do not shut down the source. In that case, you can continue to "use" it and extract trapped EM energy from it forever.

Should the grounds be the same between the load circuit and the collection circuit so that load electron current is returned through the back EMF of the primary source, then exactly as much excess work will be done inside the source to dissipate its separation of charges as was done in the external load to furnish useful work and in the external losses. In that case, overunity is destroyed, because one is using one-half the excess free energy to destroy the source faster, while the remaining half is distributed among all external loads and losses.

Since there are always some external losses besides the load, then the ratio of load power to source dissipation power is always less than unity in a conventional closed-loop circuit containing both load and source. Hence the necessity for utilizing two isolated circuits: one where energy is collected freely from the source, and one where energy is dissipated as work in the load without dissipative work in the source, and energy shuttling between them.



.

[IronHead]

Voltage with brush motor in place and in brush contact  is consistent between all caps at 6.25 volts scaling with  overall voltage of now 7.28vdc . The current is immeasurable and more virtual " if "  the battery is building current. This is rather hard to explain. Any type of oscillation would also be virtual or immeasurable.

Thank you "FatBird"  yes I have read all of Tom Beardon's work or translations as it were of Whittaker and others alike. Along with what Tom has come up with based on his knowledge there in and abit beyond his predecessors.