Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

[Neolystic]

@Mac

Good work!  If we all work together I think we will find OU.  It looks like your primary winding is side to side, while your secondary winding is up and down.  Is some of your secondary winding also side to side?

- Neo

[Neolystic]

I like the theory and it sounds like you are taking the most basics of the TPU which I must say was put forth on this forum from way back, and then forgotten. Many theories have crossed this same path of thinking. You will have to elaborate a little more on potential build specs as the relationship of the two secondaries to the primary and horizontal are not very clear. Good work though.

Thank you Wattsup.  You're correct in that most or all of my theory has been covered before, although I'm not aware if anyone has put all the pieces together in exactly the same way.  But then, what ideas are ever completely original, and not a new compilation of known principles?  As GK once said, we are all just standing on the shoulders of giants.  I think the egoism of 'this or that person already did this or that' can be as much of a hindrance to our success as any other.  Perhaps what it will take is for a lowly 'one star' to come in, without preconceived ideas, benefitting from others' years of testing and theorizing recorded here, and see some simple little connection that's the key to it all.  I have a great deal of respect for the work you've shown here, and I hope my words haven't offended.

I'm unclear about what you would like me to elaborate on.  If you're saying I need to elaborate more on the winding directions of the various coils, I can do that.  If you're saying I need to elaborate more on specific design specifications such as coil size, wire size, frequencies, etc....those specifics are still in the works.  I am hoping for feedback on many of those aspects from some of the more experienced builders here, including yourself.  Questions such as how two identically-tuned secondaries wired in parallel, spaced 1 inch or so apart,  and formed into a toroid behave in real life, simply go beyond the known capabilities of Mathematics, and require real-world experience and testing.

[TinselKoala]

this holds very little water.

the only sure way to tell if the intermittent (~2Hz) power output is higher than the constant 7.5W adapter power output, is to apply each case to a resistor and measure the temperature the resistor is raised to. chances are pretty good that the constant 7.5W will raise it higher. if the contrary is true, then mac has something and I congratulate him. until this test is done by him though, no one can say for certain that it is ou, just because it makes big sparks at a 2Hz rate.

Wait a minute, poynt99--you are making way too much sense.

[BEP]

@Otto,

<wearing my fire retardant suit now>

I have an issue with your cardboard tube. More correctly, with the spacing between the windings and the core.

We all know how conventional inductors should be built, with or without a core.
What is normally avoided when building an inductor....

If you vary the distance between the windings and the core (use thicker or thinner cardboard tubes) you should see a change in how the core magnetic is pinched. I use this same principle to divide the normal resonant frequency of a spiral coil. I also vary the turn count and driven frequency to control the division.

When you are flipping the core polarity there is some slapping going on. Correct?
Terms I've used before trying to convey the idea: Squirting, stomping on the middle of a banana, slapping, reconnection, bucking fields, etc. etc. etc.

Hope that is near the correct answer for your question 

BEP

[innovation_station]

ist's tpu battery charger 6 feeds......

here is the battery dwg configuration 


got free engery yet?.....  did someone say to split the pos.... LOL!!


ist

and here is the ist tpu....