URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[livingwaters08]

Nightlife

Are you sure it is 110 V  ?

As far as I know an oil  furnice  coil is  just a transformer .......it is very similar to  a neon  sign  transformer . 

Nightlife, resonanceman, and group,

Let's remember s1's description of the 3 coil setup in his recent post on Waterfuel1978.  He describes the coil in great detail.
Here's his post:

Re: New video 2


There are three windings on the coil, one main winding, one on each
side with deferent number of windings in each, the two windings on
each side are wound through the main winding , as 1 being a winding
and 2 being a winding and 0 being the main winding, it will look
like this 1-0-1_2-0-2. the windings are not touching each other but
they are wound through the main (0) winding, this replaces the double
coil set in the relay system. I will post the number of turns on each
winding as soon as I have all the info put together. None of the
windings have the same number of turns so the harmonics deffer when
current passes through them. This also is helping to block the 110v
from the 12v. This coil does not replace the HV coil on the vehicle.

S1R.

From this description....Is this a Tesla Coil?    Hope this helps to perfect the circuit.

Livigwaters08


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


I  just went back and watched the  videos  again
I didn't   try to  trace the wires

I did notice  something I missed before
The  first time I watched video1   I noticed  that the first thing you see   is a close up  of the  place to connect  the  place to connect the  fuel line  ......... I had thought  that  he  was connecting  the  hose  there .

In  the  2nd  video he removes the   float bowl .......and  holds it in  front of the camera for a second . 

I didn't  realise before that he was just   running water  into the intake .
He  is clearly  " flooding " the engine
I am pretty  sure that you  won't  get ANY  gas engine  to run that  steady by  doing that  that  .      IF you can get it to run that way at all .

The gas air  mixture has to be  fairly close  .......... with this process I think   all you really need  enough  water .
I  am thinking   that the times   in  video 1 where he  rotated  the  engine  by had was  to clear partial hydro lock

Now I am  thinking that the way  to  control  the  engine power is to vary   the  low voltage .


gary

[stu]

Hi Ossie,

I'm a non electronics person who has been keeping an eye on the watercar1978 forum for 2 years now, and of late this forum,and I am gathering parts to build the 9v batt circuit supplied earlier - once this is done and the circuit understood (by myself!) then the next stage would be to convert that circuit to this latest one that you have just posted.

As the Siggen is just being used to replicate the high speed firing of the ICE, is it a simple matter to replace that whole aspect of the circuitry with the pos & neg from the strobe being wired directly to the pos & neg of the coil and then the inverter circuit tied in to the neg of the coil and the coil output just as it is in the latest diagram?

I just want to try and prove my replication in stages and attempt to understand some electronic basics while I go.

Many thanks - Stu (from Northern Ireland)

[retrod]

Hi ramset,

Good advise. We certainly have a continuous arc that is very bright like an arc welder. But instead of producing such a bright arc with 1000-2000 watts input as in an arc welder. I am now doing it with just 60 watts input... Such is the difference when there no or very little heat output, unlike an arc welder...

Regards,

Ossie

Ossie, I was looking over your latest schematic, the one with the inverter. The top half looks to be the same in function to a standard ignition, let's say for a single cylinder engine with a battery ignition system (like an old garden tractor). The bottom half has the inverter and the few diodes, caps and a coil that might be what's inside s1's 'can' we saw in the video's. What do you think?

RD

[sigmaX]

My Two cents:

If you video record your testings and the resulting sparks with a camera and notice that although you can personally see the plug to spark continuously, the video  afterwards shows that sometimes there is no spark, it is just that the video cameras are not "continuous recording capable": They take 25 or 30 "pictures" per second. It just happens that in the moment of SOME of those pictures, there is no "spark" going on. Which shows also that the spark life is very little (definitely less than 1/25 or 1/30th of second).

You might use slow motion cameras (or some of the new digital cameras) that shoot 60 or more frames per second, if you want to register it correctly, or synchronize the sparking to the camera shutter (this last paragraph is theoretical, as I am sure it is not necessary, we believe anyway, if you say, that the spark is there )

Regards,

Enrique (sigmaX)

[resonanceman]

Oh? Well I understand that is the goal, but most of what I've seen
posted here recently has zero to do with an engine and everything
to do with a circuit that produces a plasma which can ignite water aerosol...
And so I got the impression that what was happening here did not
really include the engine conversion part of the plan yet...
... but perhaps I overlooked something...

Oh, and on a sidenote I don't think anyone nowadays has sunglasses
without UV filter of some sort... But you welding goggles suggestion
may be a good one.

Koen

You  didn't miss anything .

It  would be nice to jump to the end of the game and have   finished  water powered engines  running  our cars and  powering our  homes ......   We ain't there yet .  ........  We are  still working on   understanding   the   arc and how  best to make it  .
It  just doesn't make sense to   try  step  3 and 4 when  you   still have a bunch to learn about step 1

gary