URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

[Shanti]

In conventional current yes, Tesla said his radiant energy was based on "surface area", the voltage rise based on sq/in's of conductor

Where did he say this?
I read a lot of Tesla, but can't remember this statement...
Thank you...

[k4zep]

Hi Gang,

I hope everyone is a member of the  http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/WaterFuel1978/  Group.  It has a pile of excellent data from S1R from day one brought over from another list.......  I know they are upset with our discussion here on a slightly technical transformer question, but if you can not question the basics, where does the creatatiivity come in!

Forget the coil in a nail, go back to what he orginally did, read his description, look at the RELAYS and diodes (Looke at the size of those diodes!!!!!).  As Ossie noticed, LISTEN for the HUM on the orginal videos!  Inverters do NOT hum!

It is pretty simple and darnn clear what he was doing.  I believe by sheer accident, he stumbled on chopping the 110V from the inverter, adding the back emf spikes to it and summing them at the plug..............Sure you could add the funky coil in series with the "and" function but it wouldn't have/make any difference in the final outcome.....I feel the coil is a "red-hering" to steer us all away from the INDUCTIVE chop/spike process.....

I do see how he says it is not the way Ossie and I do it as our Capacative discharge does not have the HIGH multi strike plasma burst...............I suspect his real problem is longivity in those relays!  Unless most of the current is passing through the diodes and the relays are huminng along on the side producing those huge back EMF spikes!

Ben

[robbie47]

Just a simple question:

Why does't rain in a thunderstorm cause a giant explosion?

[k4zep]

Just a simple question:

Why does't rain in a thunderstorm cause a giant explosion?

Hi Robbie,

Here in FL we call it THUNDER!

Ben

[DrStiffler]

Just a simple question:

Why does't rain in a thunderstorm cause a giant explosion?

@robbie47
You are seeing a giant explosion! The strike from the upper atmosphere to the earth is similar to the anode to cathode of a spark plug in the experiments of this thread. The problem is that no one will realize that the action will not invoke a chain reaction. In other words it is totally localized around the event. The energy in a lighting strike is far in excess of the wildest dreams of any experimenter and yet it will not cause a spontaneous combustion or disassociation of water molecules past the periphery of the primary strike.

If mother nature can not do it with the power she has then you have little hope of mortal man doing it. If it were possible for a chain reaction (excitation) of non-localized water molecules, then I feel the earth would not be here today.