Hubbard coil

[ramset]

Well sorry you can't read posts at poynts place,
However, this man has an opinion on "How This Works"!!

From Here
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=457.msg8818;topicseen#msg8818

User "itworks"
Quote:
Chet, I believe Larmor's equation forms the basis for Barbat's work. The main shifts of paradigm are 1) We have to accept that low "effective" mass electrons actually are lower mass than normal. They have been observed for decades doing things that indicate they have lower mass. But because they tend to look like they are producing more energy out than in, and people are convinced that is impossible, they have made up other "relativistic" explanations for their behavior, and called them low "effective" mass, meaning "it looks like it's low mass, but we don't believe it."

The second paradigm shift Barbat is responsible for is the rejection of Helmholtz's famous claim that Newton's laws of thermodynamics applied to electrodynamics and magnetic energy. Barbat has gone through Helmholtz's original paper of 1847 that was presented to - and rejected by - the Berlin Society of Physicists. Helmholtz went on to self-publish the paper, with the disingenuous claim that it had been "read before" the Society, and he won all kinds of awards from royalty for it. However, it was based on flawed science, and Barbat has gone through it carefully and shown exactly why it was incorrect. But, as some of Barbat's writings say, Helmholtz did get something right: If forces exist which are not in line with each other, (which now we know induction and magnetic force not to be in-line), then there exists the possibility for infinite gain or loss of energy. TRUE. Helmholtz just assumed that all forces were in-line, so this situation wouldn't exist.

Think about it. An electron continually circles around a photon, without falling to the center or falling off. No one puts energy into it to make it do that; it just goes all the time. Additionally, that electron constantly emits energy and mass in the form of photons. No one is putting fuel in or material, yet out comes energy and mass, constantly. That fact in itself shows that we're nuts if we don't think there's infinite energy out there.

Barbat's genius lies in his willingness to accept that Hubbard's generator did what the reporters said it did, rather than poo-pooing it because it was unexplainable at the time. If it did work, then there had to be something wrong with our accepted version of the law of conservation of energy. So he went back through about two centuries of original papers, from Newton, Ampere, Gauss, Helmholtz, Maxwell, even Einstein, Bohr, you name it. And it was at Helmholtz where the science went haywire, he shows.

The other breakthrough Barbat made was realizing why Hendershot couldn't make his generator work when he tried again around 1960: Copper wire was now shiny, and lacked the cupric oxide coating of old wire. Knowing that, I believe Barbat could have revived the Hubbard and Hendershot type of generators, except that radium is no longer available in the quantities they worked with in the 1920s. So Barbat started looking into other photoconductors that are mentioned in his patent, as they require wavelengths more easily obtainable.

[sigma16]

"Low mass electrons" just means that electrons have a low mass as compared to particles with greater mass.  Someone misinterpreted this, as meaning that there is some form of electron with a lower mass than other electrons, and now everyone is jumping on board the "ship of fools".

[sigma16]

I often wondered if this was related to Hubbard.

http://www.gnucash.org/mirrors/mirrors/jnaudin.free.fr/html/mmcgen.htm

I feel the only safe free energy device would be a magnetic device such as that.

Back in Hubbards day, 21MHZ would have been a very high frequency but it could have been reached through harmonics produced by heterdyne.

One the flip side, Hubbard does not appear to have a cooling system on his transformer and it will get very hot. Although I saw someone write something about the cables getting hot going to the transformer and the transformer had huge wires coming from it.

You will note that the patent calls for "soft iron" and I suspect that this is because it has permanency. The permanency would produce friction as the domains resist change and this friction could cascade electrons from the FE56

NOTE that the Hubbard coil in the boat photo has four wires going to it. Two to activate the process and two to remove the energy the coil produced.

Why the step up voltage and closed loop coils? Higher voltage means higher tension. The higher the tension the higher the velocity of the current. The higher the velocity, the more mass is extracted from the inductor through centrifugal force and subsequently more current flows into the coil.

The light being introduced into Barbat's patent is used to remove electrons from the coil similar to Meyer's laser ozone generator or air gas processor as Meyer called it. In reality, it was an laser accelerator or something along those lines.

NOTE the 4 wires just like the drawing Hubbard made: Unless two of those are water hoses for cooling..

Are you smoking crack again, Buzz?  Man, you gotta lay off that stuff!  It's addictive!

Looks like more than four wires in this picture.  You can not see where they go or how they are connected, but they look like they go to the motor.  Where are the oscillator and transformer?

The drawing has two wires at one end (output?) and several wires at the other end - looks like at least eight wires.

The radium was used on the spark plugs to get a faster gap breakdown.  You can do the same with a UV source.

[sigma16]

I noted the output coil which is plainly visible - 2 wires. The other end has 4 wires showing.

So... 2 + 4 = 6

Still learning math from that 3rd world alternative high school physics site? I seem to recall you getting sideways with the American Troll Society for that.

Four wires are plainly visible running in parallel from the coil towards the motor. There may be two more wires visible coming from the left side of the transformer. (2 large and 2 small)

As for the rest of your rant, 3rd world eye doctor as well? Lens Crafters is having a two for one sale - Two pairs of glasses for the price of one! Too drunk to see straight? Look on the bright side, now you have as much street cred as IST.

Hope that helps!   BitchSlap!

Stop slapping yourself, it's a sign of insanity, or are you just feenin' for hit of the pipe?

It could easily be 6 or 8 wires between the motor and the generator.  Are you gonna tell me those are shadows?  Crackheads can't count, as you have just proven.

In the pic of the coil itself, it is hand-drawn, and the one end has at least 8 strands.

I see you have no comment on the spark gap, no comment on the magnetized cores, no comment on the distributor and HV supply...

Here's you arse back again, Trollboy.

[sigma16]

This image is from the same source as the one that shows both ends of the coil assembly, dumbass TrollBABY!

I doubt anyone would have drawn the frayed insulation on the wires at one end of the coil and not the other, Troll-sex-toy-wannabe.

8-cylinder distributor - 8 outer coils - rotates a field, TrollBABY.

Where did you get this Fe atomic crap anyway?  NMR freaks and all that crap?  You are to dumb to make that crap up.  Your handlers must have spoon fed it up your arse.  Your handlers should be proud of the insane idiot that you have become.  They sure know how to pick 'em...TrollBABY