Hubbard coil

[forest]

TheBuzz

You are right. This bad quality image is probably far far younger then from 1919. It appear to be a later replication attempt. Interesting why they spoiled photos.

[ramset]

SSOOoooooo...............

It works like this.............

No it works like that----------------

No No No It works like This.........................

Why,, an arguement like this could go to "Infinity and beyond"[BUZZ]

Or you could just Hold your breath until he says you're right
{Grumpy]
Like little Kids!

Yes you TOO fight like brothers having a rough time with sibbling rivalry.

But there is one thing that is self evident,you agree

                              iTWORKS

Chet
PsForest,
yes the pics are very poor quality.my eyes are still bleeding from trying to tell WTHeck they're fighting over?

The story goes that this man Hubbard was given this
"HOW TO DO" by an Angel.

The story also goes he died A drunk pennyless.

Perhaps the Angel didn't give it to Hubbard for a boat ride
Perhaps He gave it to Us ?
For the men on these few pages of cyberspace to put the pieces together to bring about the change.................

                           

[sigma16]

Forest,

One is a sketch and the other a photo from 90 years ago. Nothing nefarious going on, that was just the technology of the day and subsequent scan.

Barbat is a smart guy that did his homework and he probably knows what he is talking about. There is no evidence of Grumpy's "rotating fields" or whatever that was all about. Grumpy / Sigma16 is IST without the smiley faces.

Yes the photo and sketch are different, but both have the ring of 8 coils and one in the center.  The thought that the oputput coil can be inside and/or outside the 8-coils probably escaped your thoughts because you are such a smart ASS.

Barbat is as confused by terminology as you are.  Rather than enlighten assholes like you, I prefer to leave you in the dark, with the wondrous smell of your perpetual BS.

You prove your idiocy beyond a doubt by ASSuming every purported OU device actually works and that it works because of this bogus idea about mass to energy conversion.  Most don't work at all, and the trick is to use the mass, not convert it.

[markdansie]

I havnt read this thread in detail but am I missing something here?
"
Driven By Radium

In 1919 Hubbard represented the apparatus as being capable of extracting electrical energy directly from the air, but he admitted yesterday that this had been merely a subterfuge to protect his patent rights, and that, as a matter of fact, it had been a device for extracting electrical energy from radium, by means of a series of transformers which stepped up the rays.

He declined to go into detail in regard to the exact manner in which he managed to extract power from radium -- but said that, so far as he had been able to determine, there was no great difference between the Detroit machine and his.

"I never heard of this Lester J. Hendershot, the Pittsburgh electrical engineer who is demonstrating the motor", Hubbard said, "but it must be remembered that I worked on the invention for two years in Pittsburgh -- in 1921 and 1922. It was a Dr. Greenslade who represented the people who were financing me at the time -- but, of course, if the people who bought out most of my interest in the invention were to bring it out as their own machinery, they would probably do it through a man with whom I had never worked. I was employed by the radium Chemical Company at the time I was working in Pitsburgh".

[forest]

My intuition tells me that :

1) There was no radium inside Hubbard device
2) The source of both Hubbard and Hendershot devices are THE SAME ; be it angels or whatever (maybe Tesla?)

from above I conclude that this device worked like a modified DC or AC motor-generator and we have one patent very near to the solution yet not exactly the same : Alexander patent US3913004
It can generate up to 3 times more output then input so I believe it can be routed back to self-power itself via large diode bridge