Linnard?s hydrogen on demand system without electricity !

[ResinRat2]

Hi Bitbo,

I really don't know what hydrogen output is needed to run a car, to me this seems like a very inefficient method to use the hydrogen. The fuel cell idea, though expensive right now, seems a better way to go. So that means you would be driving an electric car. (I'll take the Tesla electric sportscar please, lol --  teslamotors.com ). Such a sacrifice.

My vision is a Linnard Griffin hydrogen reactor that charges your batteries through a fuel cell. That way you just plug it into the reactor and it would trickle charge your batteries overnight. The next day you've got over 200 miles of range for your fancy electric sports car. Who needs an ICE --- lol.

[rozzaa72]

well written, when you think of it, we dont need an internal combustion engine, when electric has all the same benefits.roz

[ResinRat2]

I'm looking all over the net and I can find anyone selling pure Mg colloidal solution.
A few companies in Australia are selling MgCl2 "colloidal" solution, but thats no good.
I'm trying to find my invoice for the colloids and I'll contact the paypal account.

Resin does your Mg supplier still exist?

Sorry Chris, I missed this one. ---  www.wateroz.com

[bitbo]

Hi Resin !

I really don't know what hydrogen output is needed to run a car, to me this seems like a very inefficient method to use the hydrogen.

I agree totally, but it was just a thought initiated by Walter as he mentioned his 6KW unit.
As i wrote already i am far away from adapting it to my engine, i am just seeking for FE as you do !

My maths showed me clearly that i need a huge volume for 200 Watts output. The question is, if these
200 Watt are needed to regenerate the zinc (or iron for Dr Linnards version) , or if we just need 100 Watt
and have 100 Watt for free.
(using fuel cells we will get out apprx. 400 Watt  (engine 20% eff., fuel cell 80% eff.))

We will see - my reactor will be ready at christmas as i also have a full time job and family tasks with higher priority.....

Bye,
bitbo
-Germany-

[walterj7]

While I'm going to initiate an effort to get my 6KW gen set running on Hydrogen, it's only because I have it sitting around and except for testing I've only have 6 hours on it. So it's absolutely brand new and doesn't cost me a cent.

But please don't think for one minute that I'm a proponent of using Hydrogen to power ICE's over fuel cells, because I'm not. I'm just being a good Stewart of using what I have.
Until Fuel cell's become more affordable I'm thinking the economics of a somewhat larger power requirements might be better accomplished retro-fitting fossil fuel technology with Hydrogen (HOD) on Demand technology.

I remember when I was a kid almost all heating was done with coal, then conversion burners from Roberts Gorden and others made it possible to still use the dinosaurs until newer high efficiency furnaces (99%) came into the market. These high efficiency furnaces literately paid for them selfs in only a couple of years through cost of energy savings. And I can see the same thing working here. Some, the early adopters will convert existing technology (at little cost but lots of headaches and risk) as they can /or as it makes economic sense while some wait until the technology is perfected and buy their Hydrogen Vehicle for $50,000.

Blessings,

Walterj