Electrinium

[Drannom]

Hi!

@all
Forgive me..
I just was trying to share the joy of finding an overunity device, that is supposed to be of concern to everybody.
I was making experiments a few hours ago, with the electrinium in my mind.
Again, forgive my enthusiasm with the idea of having free energy so close in the near future.
From now on I will only post things related to electrinium.

Jesus

you can post things not related to electrinium, if you want, you take the risk that i ignore you

and i do not believe you anymore, look at all your posts from the beginning, you promised to stop , and, here you have done it again

i am happy that Nitinnun post here twice, cause there is a relation with the electrinium

good night, again, and i hope to not see another lost of time

[nitinnun]

here is my updated diagram.


if you add many copper/iron atoms, and mix the middle substance VERY well,
than SHEER PROBABILITY will place the copper/iron atoms, where they are useful.



then you charge up both terminals with electricity.

this polarizes the atoms.
so that all of their positive poles are facing towards the negative terminal,
and all of their negative poles are facing towards the positive terminal.

this way, when the copper/iron atoms "harden" into ZPE molecules, the ZPE molecules will send the right charge to the right terminal

this also causes the molecules in the middle substance, to harden into a pattern that increases electrical resistance.



is it or is it not brilliant?

[Drannom]

Hi Nitinnun

so, all you need is to test some way to keep your fe and your cu in place !

the 2 atoms in the solution are free to move, so that is not a compound in the electrinium mean, it is free atoms in the solution, in electrinium the 2 atoms are fixed together in a shorter volume than normal

it is brillant, and Jesus is brillant too, he show me his intelligence in the potassium alum pyramid.....

the only difference with electrinium is that your fe and cu will not be compressed, only aligned, it may work ! with less power than electrinium, and your solution fe-cu is so easy to do, than the less power will be compensate by the big size of the cell, and the easy way may be just like this

so, it will perform as well, if it is working, many experiment to do

anyone can try any combination, any , this model will not need to be harmonically tune, brillant, indeed

i wonder to know, Nitinnun, if you have read the electrinium.pdf ?

with your system you take advantage of the difference in the molecular frequency of cu and fe to produce energy, those two metals are in equilibrium, in the electrinium we want to break the equilibrium in the etheric field with a compressed compound

you do not need to compress, so it will be easier

[sirmikey1]

nievesoliveras,
   Try a resonator with diode to your antenna device to see if
this will create a recoil or flyback effect, to charge the capacitors
very quickly, pull energy from the vaccum on demand.  Tesla
demonstrated this effect with his "Tesla Switch", and so this
may work with condensors as well. 

CREATE A VACCUM!

SM 

[nitinnun]

i'm hoping that the copper/iron atoms will be light enough, that they will stay stuck in their place, in the glue.
sort of like feathers floating on and in water, without sinking to the bottom.



i expect the copper/iron atoms to be locked into place, when the glue hardens.

until then, they just need to float in place, in the glue.
while i expose the glue with heat, to dry it quickly.



......does glue compress when it dries??
ESPECIALLY when the glue dries from heat??
could THAT be putting pressure on the metals, as long as the dried glue is whole??


because the water molecules are exiting the drying glue,
and the carbon/hydrogen atoms are COMPRESSING into polymer strands?

so copper/iron atoms in the glue, would be compressed by the glue??



one of my key concepts here, is that the atoms are connected by covalent bonds.

     H
      I
Cu-C-Fe
      I
     H

that the magnetic energy is EXCHANGED THROUGH the covalent bonds.
that there is an unbroken chain of covalent bonds, connecting the 2 terminals together.

or would the cell work best, if there was compression AND covalent bonds?

or would the compression disrupt/destroy, the covalent bonds?



i skimmed over the electrinium PDF.
but i am very right brain dominant. so asking me to read a MASSIVE amount of words, is as slow, painful, difficult, and boring, as asking me to look for a needle in a haystack.

while moving one straw of hay at a time.
with pliers.....


a left brain dominant person seems to move the hay one large bucket at a time.
and they instantly know when the needle enters in their bucket.
because they can hear the needle clink on the metal bucket.

where i can only SEE the needle with my eyes, when i am holding it in my pliers.
after i have purposely picked the needle up.



when most of the atoms covalent bonds are filled with electrons, you have CRYSTALIZATION.

wouldn't it be better to have a stable crystal, that is at peace?

instead of having a compressed mass, that is waiting to burst like a water balloon?