Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Towards Realizing the TPU

Started by poynt99, September 03, 2008, 08:46:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

MACEDONIA CD

yes  is spin fast like  jet engine turbine  <<like  my  tpu  strong sparks  > whit my small adapter ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

sparks

     Tesla designed his transformer to be a voltage multiplier. He wants to get some highvoltage to overcome the transmission line drop.  He knows that the faster the magnetic lines of force change around a conductor the higher the voltage.  The only rectifier in those days were commutators.  So he designs a static commutator utilizing magnetic fields.  Now his ac exciter pulses are converted to magnetic compression waves that circulate about the core.  Any conductor in this field then sees this magnetic field changing around it and induces a current that opposes this magnetic field shift but in this case the primemover isn't going to bog down it could care less abount counteremf and all that shit because it is in a different electrical inertial frame of reference than the play going on at the generator.  The higher the frequency of an event the more chance there is to convert it into a low frequency event of more meaningful kinetic energy conversion.  So the relatively high frequency occurance at the exciter is converted into the low frequency occurance of dynamo currents.  DC is about as low as you can go on frequency conversion.
    Everything has ac flowing through it.  Just a matter of converting it into lower frequency of higher amplitude.
    The question still remains what scource of highfrequency was SM using to create his dynamo.  This was battery technology not a free energy device by his own words.   The hf torroidal transformers in his machines are a dead give away as well as the meltdown of his core in the video where some clown is running around showing us the crossection of the torroid while SM and others in a state of panic screw around with what appears to be a glowing element used in his signal transmitter.  Could SM have been converting hf given off by a chemical reaction into lowfrequency pulsed dc?  Isn't that what you do when you do a Tesla coil?  Could be something as simple as burning nitrogen and oxygen in a spark gap and converting it to electricity.
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

wattsup

@sparks

You are very right. There is something happening much more important and that is his use of the converter is reducing the induction in the generator and hence the inherent generator drag on his drive motor. He could have shorted the generator output with a standard load as we all do today and then be exposed to the drag, but no, Tesla does things in the "best" way possible to advantage economy of function. How you treat the output is just as important as how you produce the juice. No capacitors. Just make the juice and  get it out and away from their, asap.

Here's something else about the converter. Page 4 line 64

"The construction may be carried further, as above pointed out, by enclosing these coils with iron - as, for example by winding over the coils a layer or layers of insulated iron wire."

Imagine having such a toroid that is then covered with iron wire. You can then cover the iron wire with another pick-up coil to grab more juice back for added efficiency. Hmmmm.


wattsup

@sparks

I have done much testing on the SM FTPU both in the center toroid types and the outer rings with the outer coils.

For the toroid, nothing makes any sense at all. Chokes used with such a big toroid being either laminated or ferrite cored, given the wire AWG used, would have required much more then the one layer windings with such thin wire to really do anything on the realm of significant coupling action. This is not normal.

As for the outer rings 2-3 turns and outer coil of approx 10 turns per quad, there again after so many types of pulsing there is nothing happening in the 5khz range. The only activity of coupling action from the outer coil being pulsed and measuring off the inner ring (or vis-versa) was happening at the 2mhz range which is the maximum my FG can go. I am convinced that the frequencies used in the FTPU are anywhere between 2-20mhz (or higher) but not in the 5khz range that SM said.

The references made of a slight vibration in the realm of 5khz if caused by kicks would confirm the above. If a kick is to happen between other spikes, then the frequency has to be much much  higher then the 5khz to then at least get kicks at 5khz. At 1 kick out of 100 cycles, you are already at 500khz. At 1 kick at every 400 cycles you get to 2mhz.

The again the FTPU could work at 5khz inorder to capture the power emitted by the adjacent HV lines since NOTHING in standard pulsing that range has any effect. The HV frequency as shown by EM when matched to SMs 5khz frequency claim is toooooooooo much of a coincidence to be ignored.

I wonder what the frequency was of EMs miniTPU. I think it was in the 20mhz range but could be wrong.

Now, on the other hand, for the toroid, if one looks up HF transmitters using the bucking coil configuration, you will find various uses in the category of baluns and that would also explain the meager windings. You could then postulate that the ring is a receiver and the TPU is working in a loop.

I put up a pdf file on my OU ftp site located here;
http://www.purco.qc.ca/ftp

click - Researchers - Balun Information - HFbaltransys.pdf
If you look at page 20, this will give you an idea on what the toroid(s) may be. There are tons of SM TPU photos and nick-nacks on the site for all.

Then there is the most puzzling side. I once did a test using the FTPU outer rings, coil as primary and ring as output secondary. The primary was connected to a Tesla ozone patent set-up so the outer ring coil was the primary of the working circuit. This actually gave the best coupling effect I have seen in any of my tests. But here is the question. To do this you need a coil of high induction and where in the FTPU could you see such a coil. It's not the outer coils or rings, it's not the center toroid, so where??????? It could be the one hidden on the lower disk or it could be placed inside the center of the reel structure since we see there is something there when he turns it over. I thought it looked like a microphone to induce high frequency audio feedback.

Anyways, for me it is only a question of time before I get the solution of the FTPU. There are not 1000 parts to make. The builds are very easy in variations so there should be no excuse for others to not do some DIRECTLY RELATED testing in this regard. But hey. To each his own. lol

If I was an R&D manager, I think I would have a good idea on how to go about doing the many tests to figure it out, but alone, it is always more difficult and time consuming.

@GK

I will get the Keely book. I am due for a good sofa read.

@Room3327

I think the fastest turning objects are only in the 100,000 rpm range. These are generally flywheel batteries and these flywheels are encased in carbon enclosures in case one should fly apart, it would be one hell of a bang.

@marco

I think we are doing the best we can with what we have and what we know.

turbo

Quote from: wattsup on January 24, 2009, 11:08:11 AM

@marco

I think we are doing the best we can with what we have and what we know.


The best you can ?
I think you cannot do worse.