Over-unity, Free Energy - I believe most of us dont know what they really mean!

[exxcomm0n]

Amen.

"Free energy" is a misnomer.

No says "unharnessed energy" or "previously undiscovered energy", just freeeeeee energy.

There is no such thing as free.

If it were truly free, it would be as much a hindrance as a benefit because it would crop up in the strangest of places queer'ing resultant energy quantification of "standard experimentation".

Let's stop looking for "free" and start looking for "undiscovered".

The only "free" energy I can think of would be to harness the energy in the expansion of the universe.

Stop looking for free, and start looking for energy that is already here but not discovered or utilized yet.

It's there.
But we haven't found it.......yet.   

[Magnethos]

Starting... Overunity is an incorrect concept. A device cannot produce more energy than it consumes. The extra energy comes from the vacuum.

I think the art of 'Free Energy' is the art of eliminate the current (amperage) from the system and start using open circuit paths, instead of using closed circuits. Of course, there are more choices, but I think this is the rule #1.

[TechStuf]

Yes, Energy from creative matter/Aether interactions is where the real efficiency is.....I take it you are speaking of Gabriel Kron's "Open path" negative resistor research?


I've no doubt that the correct nanomaterials of the correct geometry would produce energy right off the 'assembly' line.


Peace,


TS

[Magnethos]

Yes, Energy from creative matter/Aether interactions is where the real efficiency is.....I take it you are speaking of Gabriel Kron's "Open path" negative resistor research?


I've no doubt that the correct nanomaterials of the correct geometry would produce energy right off the 'assembly' line.


Peace,


TS

If we look at the common electricity, we have a very big problem: we cannot get a high amount of AMPERES. The problem is the amperage. We can get all the energy we want. We have schematics about how to get energy from water (using zinc electrode + copper electrode), we know how to extract a good amount of voltage 3 to 12 Volts, from the air. You need more voltage? of course, you can multiply them and get a really high amount of volt, maybe some megavolts. But... what is the problem again? We cannot get a good amount of amperes!!! Amperage is always the problem. If we look at T. Henry Moray, Ed Gray, and a lot more inventors THEY ALL USE COLD ELECTRICITY. Moray used a 30AWG wire and he draw 50KiloWatt of energy and the wire doesn't heat.

Here, we're always looking for the effective way to obtain infinite Hot/Common Energy. That is a really really Big Mistake!!! I'm trying to remember and I think I haven't heard about a free energy device using hot electricity. I have always read Free COLD electricity. And people here is trying again and again and again to obtain hot free energy, I think that is impossible or too much complex to accomplish.

I don't know a lot about this science but I think it's easy to obtain free cold energy if we know the basic theory about cold energy science. In youtube you can find some videos explaining the process.

The three big principles of free energy
* Use correct a Dipole: the common science doesn't use correctly a dipole (battery). We're destroying a free energy device instead of using it correctly. The best 'secret' is that a Dipole is a FREE ENERGY device itself!!!

* Use Cold electricity: As you know, hot electricity is not efficient in the field of free energy science. When the hot electricity find a resistor, the energy disipates in the form of heat. In cold electricity, when the energy find a resistor, the energy amplifies. Also, the universe works in an implosion/constructive principle. Cold electricity means implosion because it is obtaining energy from the vacuum. Hot electricity means explosion/destruction and it's not efficient. Hot energy works against the universe laws.

* Use open path circuits: to obtain the 'extra' energy from the vacuum or other sources.



P.S No, I'm not talking about Gabriel Kron's negative resistor, I'm talking about the Tom Bearden's theory. I don't know the relations between Gabriel Kron's theory and Tom Bearden's Theory.

[Magnethos]

A comparation