Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Bedini motor with Avramenko plug OU COP = 1.1

Started by hartiberlin, October 23, 2008, 08:22:58 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hartiberlin

Hi All,
have a look at this motor:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uoC5V53Iols

He is getting overunity with it.

18 Volts x 200 mA input= 3.6 Watts of input power.

110 Ohmx x (0.190 A)^2= 3.971 Watts Output !

That is a overunity COP of 1.1 !

Congratulations !
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

TinselKoala

With such good measurement techniques and instrumentation, I have no doubt that you are correct. Definitely overunity.
So it would be trivial to hook the output up to the input and watch it run itself, without an external source of power. At last.

I will be looking forward to the awarding of the Overunity Prize to this inventor. When will you be sending him the check, Stefan?

hartiberlin

Well, he surely has to measure it with a scope to be sure.

But maybe he will get it to feed back and have a selfrunner ?
Although, at COP= 1.1 this is probably not possible...
He would need at least COP= 2 to 3 to get a stable feedback....

Also then it needs to put out 1 Watts additionally to apply
for the OverUnity Prize.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

TinselKoala

Oh, I forgot about the One Watt requirement.
So, assuming it could self-run and produce, say, 100 mW excess, would it be legal to assemble 10 of them together, to get to the One Watt requirement? If not, why not? After all, something like a Johnson Noise Diode Array would also be assembled from many smaller units each only contributing a part of the power.

I don't see why a COP of 1.1 wouldn't allow self-running. By your own figures, the device creates 371 mW excess power. That means it makes the same amount of power that it uses, plus 371 milliWatts more. So, unless your power storage/transfer system is remarkably inefficient, there is plenty of power to run itself. If a battery charger system has too many losses, try capacitors. Capacitative power storage can be very efficient.

hartiberlin

Okay, if it is under 25 Kg in weight all in all
and all devices selfrun and put out a total of 1 Watts free energy, why not...

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum