Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!


Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!

Started by captainpecan, November 16, 2008, 11:02:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shrexes

I think you're ignoring some key equations, like that of Work.

W = 1/2 m v^2

Since the 1/2 and Mass are constants in this experiment, we don't need to worry about them. However because velocity is squared, that's where this theory debunks. You are trying to add up figures and compare them to the original, but science says you must square them first. This happens in the equation you talk about which describes a 50% loss, and it describes it here also. The square term is used extensively in math, science, and statistics. If you want to ignore it, you have a lot of people to prove wrong yet to come.

According to your video, the distances were 221 for the full charged, and then 129 and 137 for the two half charges. What your ignoring is the angular velocity of your motor. Each time it takes roughly 4 seconds to reach that distance. This means that the 221 is traveling at a greater velocity.

55.25 - Full
32.25 - Cap 1
34.25 - Cap 2

Since everything else is held constant, we can square the velocities....

3052 - Full
1040 - Cap 1
1173 - Cap 2

Obviously, the amount of work is greatly decreased because the force is greatly decreased. I don't know if this has been brought up before, but it should. Adding up the charges means nothing unless you can prove that you're getting the same amount of work from them by adding them up individually, and you aren't.

innovation_station

i guess youtube didnt like my video......

so i will make a new one

might have been a bit big 450 meg hi def

ist

makeing a smaller one ....
To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

poynt99

Quote from: allcanadian on December 13, 2008, 12:42:41 AM
Experiment 1
Three Caps are utilized, Cap 1 is 4700uF@25v, Cap 2 is 4700uF@25v, Cap 3 is 2 Farads@24v.

Start Conditions:
Cap 1 = 12.51v or 367.775mJoules energy
Cap 2 = 0v
Cap 3 = 0v
Cap 1 is discharged into Cap 2 through Cap 3, that is Cap 3 is in series with Cap 1 and Cap 2.

Finish Conditions:
Cap 1 = 4700uF at 8.09v or 153.803mJ
Cap 2 = 4700uF at 7.45v or 130.431mJ
Cap 3 = 2 Farads at 0.265v or 70.225mJ

Total Energy at Finish = 354.459mJoules Energy
354.459 / 367.775 = 96.3%

There's something odd about these electrolytic capacitors. All 3 voltages are much higher than what is predicted by Ohm's law when applied to capacitors.

C1 and C2 should be about 6.24V each, and C3 should be at about 20mV if all the caps are ideal with values are as stated.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Freezer

Quote from: innovation_station on December 13, 2008, 11:23:54 AM
i guess youtube didnt like my video......

so i will make a new one

might have been a bit big 450 meg hi def

ist

makeing a smaller one ....

I think the limit is 100mb for youtube or 10 minute time limit for the regular account.  The mb range might go up if you switch the account type to director.  You might want to use a different compression like divx which can reduce the file size dramatically without ruining the quality.

poynt99

Just did a bench experiment with two electrolytic caps I have.

Discharge C1 into C2 directly from cap to cap. Capacitors are 10,000uF, 63 WV, nichicon brand

C1= 10,000uF, Vic= 9.00V
C2= 10,000uF, Vic= 0.00V

After discharge:

C1= 4.41V
C2= 4.26V

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209