Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[PaulLowrance]

Maybe thermal energy in form of radiation?

If you don't mind, I'd like to respond that in the other thread in a moment. Not sure this thread is related to thermal energy. -->

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6388.10

The ferro-nuclear resonant frequency of an Iron?

I spent a long time working with NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance). There is no single resonance frequency for iron or any particle in terms of NMR. The resonant frequency is relative to the magnetic field the nucleus is in. For, example, the iron nucleus resonant frequency in a 7.2 Tesla field is 9.718MHz, and 16.188MHz in a 11.744 Tesla field. Here's a table -->

http://chemweb.unp.ac.za/chemistry/Physical_Data/NMR_properties.htm


Here's a question. Why not test the cavitation theory by detecting for hard X-rays or gamma rays?  It would take an infinitesimal amount of mass to energy conversion to detect the hard X-rays or gamma rays.

IMO the answer to "free energy" is right in front everyone's eyes, *ambient* thermal energy that exists in all matter all the time. My diode array experiments prove that it is possible to capture ambient thermal energy. My magnetic theory, based on conventional physics, shows that it's possible to capture more ambient thermal energy then humanity could ever use. Besides, such technology would not use up such ambient thermal energy. It would merely circulate it, so the thermal energy remains on Earth. Also, the Sun continual maintains such ambient thermal energy.

It boggles my mind how people continue to ignore this simple physics like the plague. If you people spent 1/1000th the time you spend on these other theories and idea on ambient thermal energy technology we would already have global "free energy!"  Ambient thermal energy does not *add* energy to the planet. It merely moves energy.

PL

[Pirate88179]

@ Paul:

The theory postulated is that all free energy devices are really cavitation.  (As I said in the first post of this topic, I do not necessarily believe this to be true, that is why it is being discussed)  If your thermal energy experiments with the diodes produce energy (from wherever) then it can be discussed here because the proposed theory encompasses ALL free energy devices.  Does your device work based on cavitation?  If not, then the theory is incorrect.  If so, then we can all learn something in the discussion that should follow.

As I said, I don't agree with this theory but, I don't have the background information to disagree with it intelligently. (So, I am trying to keep an open mind)  That is why I put the "?" in the title of this topic.

Bill             ***EDIT***  I wanted to add that this is The Buzz'z theory and if it turns out to be true, then he should get the credit for it.  I don't see it that way at this point, but, you never know.

[ramset]

Bill
As I understand the cavitation Theory
It involves OU devices that do not RECEIVE energy [simplest example like an antennae]
Or Pauls device [receives energy through the environment ]
  Chet

[Pirate88179]

Bill
As I understand the cavitation Theory
It involves OU devices that do not RECEIVE energy [simplest example like an antennae]
Or Pauls device [receives energy through the environment ]
  Chet

Chet:

All OU devices "receive" energy from somewhere do they not?  Otherwise we would be creating energy which we all know is not possible.  This includes devices that "appear" to work on their own but, the energy is coming from somewhere, even if we can't identify the source at this time. I believe this applies to ZPE, energy from the aether, solar energy, etc.  In my opinion they all fall into the category of receiving and/or converting existing energy.  The universe has the same amount of energy now that it did when created.  I believe all we have ever done is receive energy or convert it. (This would include the pistol shrimp)  What do you think?

Bill

[PaulLowrance]

Does your device work based on cavitation?

Of course not. It is a known fact that ambient thermal energy produces Johnson noise. It is very simple to measure Johnson noise. The energy comes from ambient thermal energy.

Does your device work based on cavitation?  If not, then the theory is incorrect.

LOL, well that's a rather closed minded statement. I'd tend to believe that thermal noise is far far far far far far far more well proven to be a source of power than cavitation. I, along with millions of EE's can show you simple experiments to measure voltage fluctuations caused by ambient thermal energy. If you have some evidence that an iron core with wire windings causes matter to be converted into energy then by all means *please* post the details that include the gamma radiation readings.   

***EDIT***  I wanted to add that this is The Buzz'z theory and if it turns out to be true, then he should get the credit for it.  I don't see it that way at this point, but, you never know.

TheBuzz, he's prometheus, the same creator of the SMOT, correct?


PL