Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[Pirate88179]

Well, I started this topic so I guess that makes me the jury.  And, it is still out.  Many devices have been listed that produce free energy without cavitation.  Maybe you call them receivers.  I don't as all free energy devices are receivers so that point is moot.  All energy comes from somewhere so, therefore all devices are receivers, not just all of the ones that don't fit your theory.

I did not name "The Young Effect", Mr. Young did. You really need to get your facts straight prior to posting...please.  I suggested the name as a possible option.  It was his choice.

I say again, please start your own topic and quit abusing folks here.  This is my second request.

Bill

[Grumpy]

So far, no one has proved that cavitation is not responsible for anomalous energy output from various devices.

We need to come up with some way to prove it.

[PaulLowrance]

Why would TheBuzz say my suggestion of testing for gamma radiation is "silly" ?   If there's nuclear cavitation, and you don't have thick shielding, then there's going to be gamma rays.

If a $15 Geiger counter was purchased, then we could quickly see if there's nuclear cavitation. If none was detected, then it means cavitation is *not* the cause of the "free energy."

PL

[Pirate88179]

@ Buzz:

Interesting retort.  But you miss some basic facts.  Yes, I agree with you (wow) about the crystal radio using the transmitter's power to work...free energy to the guy with the radio but, you and I both know where the energy comes from.

And as far as not knowing the difference between an energy receiver and an energy converter, maybe you should rethink this a bit.  A device can not convert energy unless it receives it first.  See?  This is very simple and basic but you overlook it for some reason.  The atom bomb that you refer to so often could not and would not work without the plutonium energy already existing in the core prior to critical mass.

As far as me trying to get you banned goes......you did it yourself before and I am sure you will do it again on your own.  You certainly don't need my help as you have proved before.

I can't produce evidence to prove a negative you above all should know that.  You tell me one energy device that is not a receiver of energy and then we can talk cavitation or not.  I don't think one exists.  This is just a cop out for the defects in your interesting theory.  It is a good theory, don't get me wrong.  I just don't like absolutes where everything is everything and nothing is nothing.  Absolutes are never true.  (wait, that is an absolute)  See what I mean?

I mentioned the earth battery several times but you would say that is a receiver. (I agree)  The diodes that Paul mentioned you say are receivers. (again, I agree)  Solar power, you say is receiver. (agree again)  So, I ask you to name anything on the planet, or in the universe, that is NOT a receiver of energy and I say you can't.

So, I guess that is that.  Pretty simple really.

Bill

[PaulLowrance]

So far, until someone posts a validated free energy device that is not a receiver, all of them appear to use cavitation to convert mass into the atomic energy contained within the mass.

So far my diode array is the *only* published "free energy" device that includes every detail, part numbers, how to replicate, that would produce "free energy."  So, just out of curiousity, what "validated free energy" machines have you validated?

Nuclear fusion emits gamma rays. It requires special shielding to prevent gamma rays from exiting. It just seems highly unlikely these unshielded machines are bombarding these people with gamma radiation. The fact that for example Thanes is still alive is pretty much a guarantee his machine is not producing nuclear cavitation.

For anyone who's interested in testing this cavitation theory can get a Geiger counter for $15. Please see a previous post that contains the eBay links.

PL