Cavitation. The key to overunity?

[PaulLowrance]

A few facts regarding Paul's radiation challenge and his mis-quotes attempting to smear me or distort the information I have presented:

1. The average person is exposed to 85 millirem of ionizing radiation per year. That is 1/1000 of a rem.

2. That 45 year old survey meter was not designed to detect small amounts of radiation brand new as the scale goes from 1 - 5 rem. In fact, the old joke that goes with those old civil defense meters is "If you ever had to use one and the needle moves, you are dead."

3. To expect to measure a low energy particle coming from a core wrapped in copper which shields the core in order to collect any beta and gamma radiation would be silly and becomes laughable once you expect to measure it with a 45 year old survey meter that was not designed to measure low level radiation to begin with..

4. During a Fe56 to Fe54 transmute through ferro nuclear resonance it is my understanding that Fe55 is not produced and both Fe56 and Fe54 are stable isotopes.

Perhaps Naudin should have placed a phosphorus filter near the inductor and maybe Paul should stick to building hydrogen line crystal radios or whatever it is he is doing that he claims nobody is interested in. Preferably in his own thread.

If Paul can't do his own flawed experiments with the wrong test equipment then why would I?

One other thing Paul might do is stop misquoting me.

If we look at that meter, it's not difficult for the human eye to see 0.01 units change. In 0.1 mode, that comes to 1e-3 rem per hour, which equals 8.8 rem per year. The blackground dose of natural radiation received by a US citizen is 0.3 rem per year-- reference -->
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation#Units_of_measure_and_exposure

So correct me if I'm wrong, this equipment is capable of detecting background radiation that's just 29 (8.8 / 0.3) times greater. The normal background radiation level is extremely small. So if a device cannot create 29 times over background, then how's it going to produce anything useful?

It seems this equipment is fully capable of measuring the gamma radiation. With the aid of a 10X magnifying glass you could probably see the background radiation fluctuation with this equipment, no?


PL

[PaulLowrance]

How convernient for you to  ignore the very salient point #3. Your argument appears to be as sloppy as your science.

Sorry Paul... nice try though. Why don't you save up your pennies so that someday you can afford a 45 year old survey meter in unknown condition costing $15.00 and a magnifieing glass in order to do your own flawed experiment.

Maybe if you employed a bit more integrity in your science you could afford a $15.00 surplus meter.

There was no reason to address point #3 because it *should* go without saying that the gamma rays will easily penetrate the iron core with copper windings. Even natural occurring Uranium ore would easily set off these Gieger counters.
http://www.unitednuclear.com/uranium.htm

Simple logic. In order for the Gieger counter to detect the gamma rays, the radiation would have to travel through the rock. 

PL

[Grumpy]

You do not need a Geiger counter or anything like that.

All you need is a piece of speaker wire or "zip cord" - about 8 to 10 feet long - leave one end unconnected, and connect the other end to a battery and an electrometer (with very high impedence).

Now you may say that this can't work and if you do, then I suggest you tell that to Patrick Flanagan - I'm sure you are all familiar with him.   You can earn more about scalar fields and dielectrics in one of his emails than in any book by Bearden or Bedini.  When he was about 14 he developed a circuit that could detect missile launches - seems that any large mass in motion produce a continuous emission of waves that can be detected.  Yeah, stealth ain't all they make it out to be...  Flanagan's neurophone works by scalar waves as does our nervous system.

When you start "cavitating" and electric field, which is compressing it over and over very suddenly such as by a capacitor discharge or very large inductive field collapse, you will begin to detect what will appear to be an increased charge at the battery.  This will appear to you as charged particles, but it isn't, yet it induces a charge on the battery.   

How does this happen?  What is the mechanism for gain?

Haven't any of you been paying attention?  Compression is several orders of magnitude large than refraction - go figure - nature is preprogrammed for gain!

[Grumpy]

I firmly agree with conventional physics on this one, that any nuclear fusion that produces usable amounts of power will produce gamma radiation.

Did you go to my website?  The Universe is nothing but energy. It's always exists. The big bang. Before the big bang. So how could I answer your question. It just exists. All matter is continually vibrating. If you doubt this then get a $40 microscope and you'll easily see Brownian motion.

PL

Conventional nuclear fusion is brute force.  The method of transmutation that we are discussing is finesse.

I know all matter is vibrating, but this is not a very usable form of energy, as you well know.  People are not interested in vibrating particles, diodes, or other anomalous circuits that produce minute amounts of excess energy.  It takes 20kW+ to run you car electrically, and 5kW+ for you home.  You need to look for 1000:1 gain.

[PaulLowrance]

About your wire gamma ray detector. That's not a good idea, even if it was sensitive enough, because you wouldn't know if it's picking up gamma rays, radio frequency waves, or even electrostatic fields that could be caused by just about anything.

Conventional nuclear fusion is brute force.  The method of transmutation that we are discussing is finesse.

If you can provide mathematics then scientists are willing to listen, including myself.

I know all matter is vibrating, but this is not a very usable form of energy, as you well know.  People are not interested in vibrating particles, diodes, or other anomalous circuits that produce minute amounts of excess energy.  It takes 20kW+ to run you car electrically, and 5kW+ for you home.  You need to look for 1000:1 gain.

You did not read my website. You'll see where it goes over the mathematics showing how a diode array chip is predicted to produce kilowatts. 


PL