Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



One wire transmission: Tesla and Avramenko

Started by Magnethos, January 17, 2009, 04:16:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tinu

Hi,

Take a working CFL (or other fluorescent) lamp electronically excited in kHz range (50-60Hz will do it too although less prominent) and wind several turns of wire on it or just place a wire in its proximity without winding it; one end of the wire to the Avramenko plug and the other end remains in the air. Voila. Good luck in experimenting.

Avramenko plug is exactly a half of a full bridge rectifier and it works accordingly (as a half-wave rectifier). As Pese already said, one half-wave is short-circuited to the ground through parasitic capacitances while the other half-wave is employed to charge the capacitor (or to do other useful work, as the case may be). No mysteries there but let me know if you find some.

Cheers,
Tinu

Koen1

Hold on, let me see if I understood Pese correctly here...

...is he saying that it is not at all remarkable to light up 100 LEDs
using a single AA battery, if we only transform the battery output
from DC to high frequency RF signals?
How exactly does turning the DC into RF increase the power output of the battery??

Mind you, I get the point on using a rectifying diode bridge with cap connected
to a high freq signal, seems quite logical that a single wire can be used for this.
After all, hf signals are not DC and do not necessarily need a second wire.
But that does not explain the energy gain that appears to occur. Or is that
also just an illusion?

Or perhaps I just went dumb and just need someone to recap things... ;) ?

Regards,
Koen

jadaro2600

Quote from: Koen1 on January 30, 2009, 09:30:11 AM
Hold on, let me see if I understood Pese correctly here...

...is he saying that it is not at all remarkable to light up 100 LEDs
using a single AA battery, if we only transform the battery output
from DC to high frequency RF signals?
How exactly does turning the DC into RF increase the power output of the battery??

Mind you, I get the point on using a rectifying diode bridge with cap connected
to a high freq signal, seems quite logical that a single wire can be used for this.
After all, hf signals are not DC and do not necessarily need a second wire.
But that does not explain the energy gain that appears to occur. Or is that
also just an illusion?

Or perhaps I just went dumb and just need someone to recap things... ;) ?

Regards,
Koen

It doesn't, Piratexxxx hasn't divulged the circuit diagram to his invention.  I'm not going to believe his claims until he does either.  There really isn't even any theory behind it either. ...not in 187 pages of comments.

Pirate88179

Jadaro:

First, I never claimed to invent anything and second there are only about 100 diagrams of my circuit and similar ones in the Joule Thief topic.  There are close-up and very close-up photos of my circuits, including the one used in the experiment mention here.  I do not have an exact schematic for the modified Fuji circuit as I did not build the circuit, only modified it...hence the name.

So, to recap:  Yes, I have "divulged" my circuits, I have produced videos of my circuits and experiments and as far as theories go.....there have been many discussions about how/why this works and all of them fit within conventional physics.

I make no claims in any of my experiments.  What you see is what you get.  I just happen to find this all very interesting.  Not everyone will and that is fine with me.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

jadaro2600

Quote from: Pirate88179 on January 30, 2009, 05:31:17 PM
Jadaro:

First, I never claimed to invent anything and second there are only about 100 diagrams of my circuit and similar ones in the Joule Thief topic.  There are close-up and very close-up photos of my circuits, including the one used in the experiment mention here.  I do not have an exact schematic for the modified Fuji circuit as I did not build the circuit, only modified it...hence the name.

So, to recap:  Yes, I have "divulged" my circuits, I have produced videos of my circuits and experiments and as far as theories go.....there have been many discussions about how/why this works and all of them fit within conventional physics.

I make no claims in any of my experiments.  What you see is what you get.  I just happen to find this all very interesting.  Not everyone will and that is fine with me.

Bill

Look up the part numbers and recreate your circuit - don't you feel some duty, at least, to recreate the circuit on your own terms? ...modified fuji circuit or some other version of the original.  There are indeed hundreds of pictures of this circuit or modified version of this circuit on that thread.  Having a link to the working one would be nice.  ( there is an uploads and downloads section.)