Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[PaulLowrance]

The energy is for a PROVEN scientific fact coming from the virtual particle flux of the quantum vacuum. You would be ignorant to say it comes from anywhere else.

This was proven in 1957 for which there was a Nobel Prize awarded.

The fields are virtual particles, but you're making no point. So is the DC voltage from the current that flows from the battery, LOL.


PL

[PaulLowrance]

Of course, there is a current. But that current is of neutrinos (?) instead a current of electrons.
When I say about pure voltage, I say about electrostatic scalar potential. We don't need to draw current from a battery to get energy. Maybe that pure potential is similar (or is the same) as Radiant Energy. I'm not sure about that.

if you remember the electrical relaxation time in a conductor, in the first period is flowing pure voltage in the circuit and after a very very little time, current starts to flow. If we're able to get that pure voltage from that period, we will be getting energy from the battery without discharging it (because we aren't drawing current).

The energy particle of voltage is SUB-atomic (maybe neutrinos¿?) and the energy particle of current are the electrons. We can get energy from both, voltage+current (electromagnetic, transverse) or pure voltage (electrostatic scalar potential, radiant?)

Like I said, you have no conclusive evidence that the device in that video is a legit perpetual motion machine. If it is, then you can't say it's not from ambient thermal energy.

PL

[Magnethos]

NRGFromTheVacuum,

You're a day dreamer. I used to day dream when I was in my twenties. 

PL

That is all that you can say? I think you haven't arguments to answer to NRG. That is your problem.

If you have look some material of NRG you will know that NRG has a deep knowledge about the TRUE laws of electricity phenomena. Of course, I am learning and I haven't enough knowledge, but it's impossible to think that NRG hasn't enought knowledge. I'm 120% sure that NRG knows billions of times more than you.

But what about you? You are here only to discredit any theory different of your theory. In that field (in discrediting), you are very constant.

[NRGFromTheVacuum]

NRGFromTheVacuum,

You're a day dreamer. I used to day dream when I was in my twenties.

PL

Is that the most constructive argument you can come up with when someone uses real science to explain something.

I'm the dreamer even though I work in a field that imploys these technologys, and I actualy have devices instead of just a theory.

Your the ones who's dreaming guy.....

[PaulLowrance]

That is all that you can say? I think you haven't arguments to answer to NRG. That is your problem.

If you have look some material of NRG you will know that NRG has a deep knowledge about the TRUE laws of electricity. Of course, I am learning and I haven't enough knowledge, but it's impossible to think that NRG hasn't enought knowledge.

But what about you? You are here only to discredit any theory different of your theory. In that field, you are a speciallist.

No, I'm a realist. I gave NRG's claim the benefit of doubt, but still to this day he's ignored my request to show the capacitance readings on his capacitors immediately before and after doing his experiments. That's being very dodgy, to make a big experimental claim and not put forth effort to address simple issues.

And anytime NRG wants to talk real conventional physics with me, just let me know.

PL