Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[PaulLowrance]

In this thread I posted a link with some videos from a youtube guy showing that he was able to extract pure voltage in an easy way. I asked the guy but the guy doesn't connects in youtube for some months.
And I have seen more videos about energy without current. So, I think it won't be as difficult as you say.

Well we don't if it's a legit claim or not. Also, if it's legit, then you have no idea where the energy is coming from. For all you know the energy could be from common ambient thermal energy. 

And you? You say me that if I want to succed in a legit "free energy" machine anytime IN THE NEXT CENTURY?
You have repeated a lot of times that you have mathematically proven in software a "free energy" theory. But... when we will see a prototype? In the next millenium?

If it would take a millennium to make a machine that captures more ambient thermal energy than losses, then it may take a billion years to make the equivalent *ZPE* machine. Besides, I don't agree with you that it would take me millennium. I'm now down to the dirty details-- finding the materials, etc. The difference between me and other people at this forum is that I *refuse* to play guessing guess. My philosophy is to spend a lot longer thinking, and less time building. So when I build my machine, the odds are a lot higher that it will work.

PL

[Magnethos]

evidence of pure voltage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3soSDAJLaL8


I think Van der Graaff gen is another source of pure potential.
Another one: Wimshurst Machine

I'm talking about machines that can draw pure voltage. But they are only examples, because the project is based in a system to get pure voltage from a battery, not using a moving device.

[PaulLowrance]

evidence of pure voltage:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3soSDAJLaL8


I think Van der Graaf gen is another source of pure potential.

I have no idea what you mean by "pure voltage," but there *is* current. There is no way you're going to get sparks without current.

PL

[Magnethos]

Of course, there is a current. But that current is of neutrinos (?) instead a current of electrons.
When I say about pure voltage, I say about electrostatic scalar potential. We don't need to draw current from a battery to get energy. Maybe that pure potential is similar (or is the same) as Radiant Energy. I'm not sure about that.

if you remember the electrical relaxation time in a conductor, in the first period is flowing pure voltage in the circuit and after a very very little time, current starts to flow. If we're able to get that pure voltage from that period, we will be getting energy from the battery without discharging it (because we aren't drawing current).

The energy particle of voltage is SUB-atomic (maybe neutrinos¿?) and the energy particle of current are the electrons. We can get energy from both, voltage+current (electromagnetic, transverse) or pure voltage (electrostatic scalar potential, radiant?)

[NRGFromTheVacuum]

Well we don't if it's a legit claim or not. Also, if it's legit, then you have no idea where the energy is coming from. For all you know the energy could be from common ambient thermal energy. 

The energy is for a PROVEN scientific fact coming from the virtual particle flux of the quantum vacuum. You would be ignorant to say it comes from anywhere else.

This was proven in 1957 for which there was a Nobel Prize awarded.

I have no idea what you mean by "pure voltage," but there *is* current. There is no way you're going to get sparks without current.

PL

You can indeed have sparks without current. This would of course rely on the fact that electrons are not what your using to generate the sparks. Of course you would know nothing about that.