Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[Magnethos]

No, I'm a realist. I gave NRG's claim the benefit of doubt, but still to this day he's ignored my request to show the capacitance readings on his capacitors immediately before and after doing his experiments. That's being very dodgy, to make a big experimental claim and not put forth effort to address simple issues.

And anytime NRG wants to talk real conventional physics with me, just let me know.

PL

I know the work of NRG has been replicated by others, and they have got the same results as NRG.
All that people used damaged caps as you said? Or maybe you have no idea to explain that phenomenon and you only can say that... that is an error?

At least, NRG has built some devices and has shown and proved his claims. But you are the entire day showing only pure theories. You haven't built anything yet. NRG has a lot of advantage more than you.

And of course, the only one that has proved to known REAL physics is NRG. You are only talking about school physics. NRG takes the physics to the next level: the advanced (real) level.
But of course.,.. you haven't shown enough capacity to argue in the level of NRG.
That is really proven.

[PaulLowrance]

I'm the dreamer even though I work in a field that imploys these technologys

What technologies, and doing what? Please be specific.

I actualy have devices instead of just a theory. Your the ones who's dreaming guy.....

I've seen them. So far you refuse to take simple measurements that are clear issues.  As far as my theory, sorry, but it's not my theory. It's called conventional physics. Try taking a look at the math equations found in the open-source FEMM software.


PL

[PaulLowrance]

At least, NRG has built some devices and has shown and proved his claims. But you are the entire day showing only pure theories. You haven't built anything yet.

Stop spreading lies will you. You obviously haven't looked at my website.

NRG has a lot of advantage more than you.

And of course, the only one that has proved to known REAL physics is NRG. You are only talking about school physics. NRG takes the physics to the next level: the advanced (real) level.
But of course.,.. you haven't shown enough capacity to argue in the level of NRG.
That is really proven.

You people are so obvious. So who pays your bills to f--- up humanity spreading rediculous garbage that wastes time from legit researchers? And I only make that comment because of how dodgy NRG is and the completely unproven so-called science he's spreading.

I know the work of NRG has been replicated by others, and they have got the same results as NRG.

Who?  I see one replication in this thread, and the guy clearly said he did *not* get over-unity. So can we chalk up another victory for the user, NRG? A another success in wasting someones time in replicating his experiment.



PL

[Magnethos]

One thing is proven,
The only intention you have is to spoil this thread, saying that all us are wrong because we haven't mathematically proven our theories and you're the only one here in this forum that has the valid answer to the "free energy" problem, because you have calculated and tested in a software your theory and you are right and we are wrong. This is message you are transmitting and repeating all the time.
Send a message to Stefan and say him that he needs to close this forum because you're the only one here that has the answer.

So please, if you want to collaborate in this project of this thread, posting some usefull information that can help us to develop some usefull result, do it.

But If you are here in this thread only to discredit all these posts and your intention is that all people visit your website... please... start opening threads to discuss about your theory, your website and all that you want to discuss. But stop discrediting us.

If we're right we will know it. If we're wrong, we will know it too. But permit us to discuss all the theories we want because I haven't (and I won't) visit your website to post that you're right or you're wrong.

[PaulLowrance]

Oh no you're not going to get away with that, Magnethos. You claimed a lot of people have successfully replicated NRG's experiments to prove NRG's claims. If it's the claim of his bifilar coil producing extra energy, then lets see these replications. I'll ask you *again*, where are these replications?  So far I see one replication in this thread, and the guy said and showed in the video that it was less than 100% efficiency.

And please stop twisting my words. Half of what you claim of me is untrue. I asked NRG a lot of times to show cap measurements immediately before and after doing his experiments. He just ignores the request. Maybe he did them already to discover the error. Or maybe he has other intents. IMO, it's only a matter of time before ***legit*** researchers begin to wise up to you people.

PL