Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!

[NRGFromTheVacuum]

Hello,

I would like to make a few comments on both the subject of my "Free Electrical Energy" experiment and the reasons for my "dodgyness" to certain measurement requests.

The reason I came to this forum was to discuss, develop, and comment in a constructive way about my experiment and the science behind it. So others may learn the complex reality that drives the multi-dimensional world you live in. I understand their has been countless calculations done by others that show my experiment presents a unique situation with a COP >1. First off, I never stated at anytime that my experiment produced a COP >1. I stated that the energy captured in the secondary capacitor (30uF) was a different form of energy thus allowing it to be continually amplified to produce more work then the energy used to capture it. My measurements show all of the input energy that was transferred from the primary capacitor (7500uF) to the coil is lost. This means all the energy found in the secondary capacitor (30uF) comes from another source all together. If you carefully examine the circuit you can see while in operation, that all energy from the source is blocked from entering the secondary capacitor (30uF). So NO "overunity" is present in this particular experiment..

I understand that some of you may be having trouble grasping the fundamental processes of reality taking place in this experiment. This is expected any time you present a very complex and very different design opposed to what you've all been taught. The truth is in the circuits, building and designing them to gather energy rather then consume it.

I can only briefly look at this thread on the weekdays because of the prodigious amount work presented to me lately. I have just recently traveled for a contract from which I just returned, only to see fruitless arguments and bickering here. How is any progress going to be made if arguments are the only subject matter being debated. @ PL: I apologize for my so called  "dodging" of direct measurement requests but as I stated before. I have a prodigious amount work presented to me, and your not the only one to request a specific measurement.

So let me just explain where I come from and why I have come to the conclusions I presented. I graduated from a technical trade school with a "Certificate of Proficiency" in electronics and a textbook understanding of electricity. I then moved on to college out of state where I acquired a bachelors in electrical engineering. My final project's subject was on Nikola Tesla. Which guided me toward some basic knowledge of electrical phenomenology. As intrigued as I was with electrical phenomena I decided the best path for me would be to study physics. So I attended a college in my home state for material science, physics and particle physics. After gathering knowledge of electrical engineering, advanced physics, and some basic electrical phenomena I knew their was a big piece of the picture missing. So I worked hard to acquire a job with the privilege to work on "out-of-the-box" technology's which the average citizen is not privy too. I have now since worked on those technology's. Let me just give you a short list of the companies, corporations, institutions, military centers, and laboratory's, to which I have been contracted to work with.

General Electric Company, General Dynamics, General Atomics, General MEMS Corp, The Boeing Company, Boeing Satellite Systems Inc, Lockheed Martin Corp, Orbital Science Corp , Pratt & Whitney, Apache Aerospace, The Aerospace Corp, Ball Aerospace & Technology Corp, Bell Aerospace Textron, Boeing Aerospace Division, Ensign Bickford Aerospace, GE Aerospace Division, Grumman Aerospace, I.S. Aerospace, ITT Aerospace/Communications Division, Kanan Aerospace Bloomfield, Kidde Aerospace, Michigan Aerospace Corp, Rosemount Aerospace Inc, Smith Aerospace LLC, JDS Uniphase Corp, Quantum Electro-Optical Systems Inc, Raytheon Optical Corp, Quantum Applied Science & Research Inc, Northrup Grumman Space Technology, Kamaan Aerospace,
Florida Space Institute, NASA Glenn Research Center, NASA Langley Research Center, NASA Ames Research Center, NASA Kennedy Space Center, NASA Johnson Space Center, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Naval Under Sea Warfare Center, Naval Air Warfare Center, Naval Oceans System Center, NRAD (Naval Research & Development), NCCOSC (Naval Command Control and Surveillance Center), Wright Patterson Airforce Base, Naval Research Laboratory, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Air Force Research Laboratory,  US Army Laboratory Command, US Army Research Laboratory, US Army Aviation & Missile, US Naval Observatory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, AVCO Research Laboratory, Sandia National Labs, Los Alamos National Labs, Wyle Laboratories, Perdue University Birck Nanotechnology Center, University of Illinois Micro & Nanotechnology Laboratory, John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and many more..

These companies, corporations, institutions, military centers, and laboratory's, hire people to utilize, apply and understand the process of reality to which I have been suggesting. (Even if you don't believe it) To say that any or all of them are incorrect in their assumptions would be indubitably wrong and naive none the less. (Or ur an agent of disinformation) I don't merely make up what I say or quote it from the works of great scientists like Tesla, and Bearden. I have directly been involved in working with this technology and know for a FACT what is going on in my circuits. I do not use computer simulated math equations or conventional magnetic theory to build, compose, and engineer any of my circuits.That will never lead you toward "overunity", it only guarantees failure. I use real wisdom of the quantum vacuum from actual laboratory experiments and tests preformed in REALITY. From this experience I measure and calculate the effects I want to engineer when permitted to do so.

I had an agreement with Stefan to discuss my experiment "Free Electrical Energy". Under the conditions that I'm not forced to violate any nondisclosure agreements that I may have signed with any companies, corporations, institutions, military centers, or laboratory s.

** I say this with a straight face ** By posting the names of these companies, corporations, institutions, military centers, and laboratory's to emphasize my point, I am undoubtedly risking my career and possibly more then that.

Best Regards,
     NRG

[capthook]

First off, I never stated at anytime that my experiment produced a COP >1.

Ooops!!

Screen-shot from your video saying otherwise!

P.S.  As a spark is very lossy, trying to capture 'free energy' by way of a spark is a hopeless waste of time IMO.

[NRGFromTheVacuum]

Ooops!!

Screen-shot from your video saying otherwise!

P.S.  As a spark is very lossy, trying to capture 'free energy' by way of a spark is a hopeless waste of time IMO.

Read what you circled "achieved COP CAN reach >1"

It does not say "achieved COP does reach >1"

Even if it did say "achieved COP does reach >1" its a stipulation based on the first part of the statement.

Lets decipher..

"With the proper make and break timing, <--------------------------- Which a human cannot produce!

or 98% Al, 2% Fe Wire, <------------------- Which I'm not using!

the achieved COP can reach >1"

[Mannix]

Nrg,

I liked your videos...this is way too simple to be true    (joke)

Please can you give us all a specific shopping list as I think that many of us would like to actually do your experiment before commenting.

like the core material...where to obtain the special wire, caps  etc

thanks in advance



Lindsay

[PaulLowrance]

NRG,

About two weeks ago I sent you a private PM at youtube offering a suggestion to replicate your own device to see if there's anything special about the way it's wound, and perhaps even filming segments of you winding the core. Perhaps you did not see this PM because there was no reply.

PL