ENERGY AMPLIFICATION

[Dave45]

When you wind your next conventional coil think of a particle moving in one direction away from you traveling in the wire when you reach the end and start winding back turn the coil around and notice the direction of the winding, remember the particle is moving through the wire away from you. You have to look at it from the particle's perspective.

We want energy to move naturally through our system, not with reversed directions and angular momentum.
We want to gently guide it but in a direction that it already wants to go.

[PARAV]

If you'll bare with me I start here http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/inductor1.htm

The reason for this strange behavior is the inductor. When current first starts flowing in the coil, the coil wants to build up a magnetic field. While the field is building, the coil inhibits the flow of current. Once the field is built, current can flow normally through the wire. When the switch gets opened, the magnetic field around the coil keeps current flowing in the coil until the field collapses. This current keeps the bulb lit for a period of time even though the switch is open. In other words, an inductor can store energy in its magnetic field, and an inductor tends to resist any change in the amount of current flowing through it.

The inductor stores energy in its magnetic field it comes back to source in the form of bemf (high voltage) but also moves forward femf in the form of high current to keep the light bulb lit after the switch is open.

I developed a magnetic field model long ago so I figured if it held water I should be able to tell what was happening by looking at the model.
I realized the inductor not only stores energy in its magnetic field but also separates the voltage from the current in the form of cw and ccw fields.
So what happens when the inductor is shut off the bemf (high voltage) comes back to source the femf (high current) moves forward into source.
I thought this is why high voltage is easy to collect but current is hard to collect because it runs on to source, so I started looking at the tank circuit but realized every time the energy is collected in the cap and released back through the inductor the same problem occurs the magnetic field builds the voltage come back and current follows on through.
I studied on this for awhile and it was something Tito said over on the Ali thread that made a lot of sense, connect the end of the primary to the beginning of the secondary, this way the current runs on into the secondary.
I pondered this for awhile then remembered I was playing with a cw winging and ccw winding on a iron core and noticed if both coils were powered from the center the poles stayed the same they didnt switch, so I started looking at this in relation to the magnetic field and its cw and ccw storage system and realized if one coil was cw its bemf would be voltage and its femf would be current and the other coil ccw its bemf would be current and its femf would be voltage, the poles never change.
I have always been a big fan of Leedskalnin and long ago realized any free energy device would have to have the shorted coils that make his pmh work, they create a standing field that can be drained from.

This is getting long winded so I will cut to the chase
wind one coil trifilar cw
wind another coil trifilar ccw
first wire on each coil set is the primary
second wire on each coil set connected as per leedskalnin's pmh - shorted coils
the last wire on each coil set is the secondary one will put out voltage the other current
Ok we want our voltage and current to be out of phase so we need to drive the coil sets out of phase, we can do this with the flip flop circuit.
Connect the end of the primary's in each coil set to the beginning of the secondary's in each coil set, thanks Tito.

The system will pull energy from the magnetic field naturally without flipping the poles or breaking the dipole.
I did some experiments with ice long ago and realized that the electric field wants to be parallel to the earth, build the coils in a vertical orientation.

Hi Dave,

I really like your ideas and logic on the above.

So much so, that I am going to have a go at it as well.

Can you tell me what type of flip flop driver circuit you had in mind for your set up??

Thanx in advance--Paul

[forest]

I'm looking for info how to see the current flow direction in secondary compared to primary,  magnetic induction principle but not for moving magnet but for transformer action with pulsing DC.

[Bob Smith]

There is a generic schematic of a flip-flop circuit at the bottom of page 29 at Patrick Kelly's electronic tutorial here:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter12.pdf
See "Monostable Multivibrator", also known as flip flop circuit.
Perhaps Dave and some others have a more detailed one in mind.
Bob

[PARAV]

There is a generic schematic of a flip-flop circuit at the bottom of page 29 at Patrick Kelly's electronic tutorial here:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter12.pdf
See "Monostable Multivibrator", also known as flip flop circuit.
Perhaps Dave and some others have a more detailed one in mind.
Bob

Hi Bob,

Thanx for that info. I appreciate it.

I was also looking at that same chapter from Page 40 on down using the 555 chip as an astable vibrator which can offer a wider range of frequencies -am not an expert here--I'll wait for Dave45 for any further inputs--but at least I now have a better understanding --of monostable and astable flipflops/vibrators etc.

My hats off to Patrick Kelly's tutorials with his  multitude of pricelesss  information on every aspect of the free energy scene. He's  been a God send to me -- I have learned so much about electronics in the last couple of years from his web site.

Thanx again,--Paul