Anti-gravity Motor! (Everyone please read, very important)

[thirteen]

can gravity be messured as a wave ??

i would of thought because it's a force, it's not realy outputting anything  e.g. like light/sound

[0c]

How do you measure gravity waves?

This might help you get started:
https://www.ego-gw.it/editorialboard/list.aspx

[gravityblock]

Since we're talking about waves, below is a link to a video, some food for thought.  Dolphins playing with bubble rings that do not float up to the surface.  I believe the momentum of both the water and air are combined into one momentum to get this spinning vortex. It's all about combining the two forces into one. Gravity divides a force into 2 opposing forces and anti-gravity/OU combines the 2 opposing forces into 1 force.

Dolpins playing with bubble rings:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMCf7SNUb-Q

Below are a couple of comments from other people on this video.

Vortices like these form at the tip of a fin and remain invisible until a dolphin cuts one off and blows air into them. When the air gets trapped inside the spinning water it acts as if it was weightless.

The bubble ring is actually a spinning air vortex. The air inside and the water surrounding it is constantly spinning. Upon the creation of the bubble the dolphin pushes it down, this momentum combined with the force of the vortex prevents it from rising for a few seconds after creation.

[gravityblock]

@thirteen regarding extra dimensions:

A 3D object will cast a shadow onto a 2D surface.  The 2D surface can only see and experience this shadow and can not actually see and experience the full 3D object.  Could it be that gravity is such a weak force relative to the other fundamental forces in nature due to the possibility that we are only seeing and experiencing the shadow of time. Is time and gravity the same? Is gravity the shadow of time?

This stuff is mind boggling, as if my mind isn't already boggled enough......LOL

[Low-Q]

@thirteen regarding extra dimensions:

A 3D object will cast a shadow onto a 2D surface.  The 2D surface can only see and experience this shadow and can not actually see and experience the full 3D object.  Could it be that gravity is such a weak force relative to the other fundamental forces in nature due to the possibility that we are only seeing and experiencing the shadow of time. Is time and gravity the same? Is gravity the shadow of time?

This stuff is mind boggling, as if my mind isn't already boggled enough......LOL

You just made me sleepless for a few more nights - hehe. When I start thinking of the subject, the toughts contiues to work all night. It is a very interesting subject - gravity. I have tried to explain to myself what this is, and have some ideas on what it might be.

What we know is that gravity has a direct connection to mass and distance. So further, we know that gravity is relative linear, by means that two balls of steel, 1 meter in diameter, 1 meter apart work on eachother with the same force as two balls, 2 meter in diameter, 4 meters apart - as a twice the diameter is four times heavier.
gravity is regardless of magnetism and electric charge. Gravity is the third dimension - magnetism, electricity, and gravity.

Further I'm temped to believe that gravity is a product, difference, or sum of magnetism and electricity. Somehow gravity force on another object is double as distance is halving. For magnetism the magnetic force is four times stronger as you halving the distance. The same for static electricity - two opposite static charged objects attracts in the same way as magnetism. However, an electric charged object can have the same polarity in the whole object, while magnetical objects allways have two poles. There isn't such as a magnetic monopole, right? But an electrically charged monopole is possible.

Gravity is also some kind of a electrical monopole, but the force is allways attracting. So there must be something in the space between electrons and nukes which is attracting eachother, or something opposite of matter that attracts matter somehow. A kind of antimatter which is a product, difference, or sum of electricity and magnetism.

I want to see this antimatter as the "negative" pole of matter as we know it, but the matter as we know it is just so much more dominant in mass. If it make sense I think you have to "make" antimatter somehow. But you cannot do it with matter, so you might be able to make a "lookalike" with electrons and magnetism, by manipulating matter into a less dominant part. Or, you must manipulate mass by removing the captured antimatter in the space between electrons and nukes. And the only approach to do so is to force the electrons to spin faster, making more space between the atoms - in other words reducing density. But then, an antigravity approach will result in no matter at all, so we are on ground zero....

Oh, man, I get a little excited about the subject. I will definitly NOT sleep well tonight

OK, that was the brainstorm from me on the subject...just thoughts no knowledge. I hope it can be used to something

br.

Vidar