Anti-gravity Motor! (Everyone please read, very important)

[gravityblock]

Yes I can visualize a gravity-manipulating device and have been experimenting for quite awhile now, mostly learning what does not works.
It is difficult to control something when you are not 100% sure of what it is that you are trying to control. I personally think that the Ether-Vortex Theory offers the best hope for such a device to work.

Here are some things that I have posted on this theory.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3704.msg62833#msg62833
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3704.msg62960#msg62960

A vortex (pl. vortices) is a spinning, often turbulent, flow of fluid. Any spiral motion with closed streamlines is vortex flow. The motion of the fluid swirling rapidly around a center is called a vortex. The speed and rate of rotation of the fluid are greatest at the center, and decrease progressively with distance from the center.

A couple examples below of vortices:

1) In the hydrodynamic interpretation of the behavior of electromagnetic fields, the acceleration of electric fluid in a particular direction creates a positive vortex of magnetic fluid. This in turn creates around itself a corresponding negative vortex of electric fluid.

2) Lift-induced drag of a wing on an aircraft.

3) Smoke rings or Bubble rings

4) Tornadoes and Hurricanes

In the meantime, please don't discredit this on the basis it doesn't fit with your Ether-Vortex Theory. I believe in the ether, but I also know a device that generates a vortex such as the potential capabilities of this device, could manipulate this ether or the examples above for anti-gravity.  I do not believe we need to have an ether-vortex for over unity.

[Low-Q]

A vortex (pl. vortices) is a spinning, often turbulent, flow of fluid. Any spiral motion with closed streamlines is vortex flow. The motion of the fluid swirling rapidly around a center is called a vortex. The speed and rate of rotation of the fluid are greatest at the center, and decrease progressively with distance from the center.

A couple examples below of vortices:

1) In the hydrodynamic interpretation of the behavior of electromagnetic fields, the acceleration of electric fluid in a particular direction creates a positive vortex of magnetic fluid. This in turn creates around itself a corresponding negative vortex of electric fluid.

2) Lift-induced drag of a wing on an aircraft.

3) Smoke rings or Bubble rings

4) Tornadoes and Hurricanes

In the meantime, please don't discredit this on the basis it doesn't fit with your Ether-Vortex Theory. I believe in the ether, but I also know a device that generates a vortex such as the potential capabilities of this device, could manipulate this ether or the examples above for anti-gravity.  I do not believe we need to have an ether-vortex for over unity.

Well, the speed is constant in a vortex, but the rpms at the smaller diameter in the center is higher. Different speed in a vortex cause friction and force it to stop spinning - but that is not the case in a vortex, right?

Vidar

[cameron sydenham]

i am in way over my head. after trying to read about ether, i feel like i have been drinking it.

[gravityblock]

Well, the speed is constant in a vortex, but the rpms at the smaller diameter in the center is higher. Different speed in a vortex cause friction and force it to stop spinning - but that is not the case in a vortex, right?

Vidar

Low-Q, You have some nifty thinking.  You're alright with me.

[gravityblock]

From the research I have done, a two axial system will provide a linearity of 15, and this doesn't take into account the angular momentum of the additional mass in a system such as this.  Since we have electric motors that are 85 - 95% efficient to begin with, this linearity of a conservative 15, without the additional mass being considered, should push us over unity. This doesn't mean my research is correct, but I feel it should be investigated. Just my thoughts on this.