Zero emissions is a bunch of Bullsh!t

[jadaro2600]

Those of you who know my posts may find this a bit off-kilter so...

The idea of claiming zero emissions is bullsh!t.

If you can see it, it's reflecting light - an emission.  If it gives off heat, it's emitting heat.  If is takes in water and puts out vapor, it's emitting vapor.  If you plug it into the wall and it changes a battery or a hydroxy cell - it will eventually emit heat, motion or otherwise.  If it's got a transformer in it, it's going to be emitting electromagnetic radiation.

[ Low Emissions ] is the better way to go.

Claiming zero emissions is a quick way to a false claims suit.  Whether in fact or in theory - there is no such thing as zero emissions unless one is talking about the void itself...which itself seems like nothing more than an idea.

( energy star is a branding scam? )

[b0rg13]

lets just use the *clean * burning coal(what a fuking joke) obama is talking about, not the solar he talked about and pretty much for got about.

[hammuraby]

my beloved displacer of bullshtt.....
whatever, this job, is usefull to make growing a salad!

the right definition of emissions zero, would have to be to zero permanent modifications effects;
therefore to exclude:
a) all the emissions that are inert,  regard to the physiological beingness, direct and indirect;
b) all the emissions that are absorbed back with the change of temporary induced physical state….

nothing  simple...
but the precision, not always goes well, because it involves a unclear explanation, than the person W/out a  technical knowlenge, can not to absorbs

[Tito L. Oracion]

Those of you who know my posts may find this a bit off-kilter so...

The idea of claiming zero emissions is bullsh!t.

If you can see it, it's reflecting light - an emission.  If it gives off heat, it's emitting heat.  If is takes in water and puts out vapor, it's emitting vapor.  If you plug it into the wall and it changes a battery or a hydroxy cell - it will eventually emit heat, motion or otherwise.  If it's got a transformer in it, it's going to be emitting electromagnetic radiation.

[ Low Emissions ] is the better way to go.

Claiming zero emissions is a quick way to a false claims suit.  Whether in fact or in theory - there is no such thing as zero emissions unless one is talking about the void itself...which itself seems like nothing more than an idea.

( energy star is a branding scam? )

Hi sir

how about cold electricity?
and also the water fuel they talk about?

what do you think sir?

otits

[jadaro2600]

Hi sir

how about cold electricity?
and also the water fuel they talk about?

what do you think sir?

otits

As soon as something becomes 'zero emissions' it becomes non existent.

Cold electricity?  ..is there a such thing?  And is it defined by conjecture?

A water fuel tank is just a thing - what uses it as fuel?

All transfers of energy are emissions, whether they are from one side of the machine to another.  The idea of 'zero emissions' is just silly.

We need emissions in order for their to be 'work done'  ... and yes, the idea of 'clean burning' is just as asinine as the idea of 'zero emissions'.  This is especially true for coal, where they gerrymander the CO2 back into the ground - essentially sweeping it under the rug.

Who's to say that CO2 won't come flooding back out one day killing millions in the low lying areas around it.  Or is that their plan?