Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

I have that video backed up. "Edward Mitchell and Gunther Rattay Interview #3 with John Frazer". I never saw #1 and # 2 published.

Thanks as that is correct


I thank the creator for John Fraser as Sterling Allen was supposed to give me an interview but snubbed me when he heard I burned out one of the two transformers I had brought with me. I also had a speaking part in the event that got canceled for reasons unknown. I was all set up to tell everything I had learned about the technology from following the scientific method and have a Q & A part but as I said my part in the event was canceled.
Like I said that was the first time anyone had ever seen someone placing such a high voltage potential on the plates of a water fuel capacitor as before then I think the highest I had seen someone else do was around 560 volts and there I was placing 7.4kv to the cell. So clearly I am doing something much different than everyone else getting voltage levels up this high and the amp readings on the isolated side of the voltage intensifier circuit was only around 0.3 mA which is great amp restriction. I'd run the unit for over 24 hours taking temperature readings every 30 minutes and found that the cell just followed the temps of the day. I guess 0.3 mA wasn't enough to change the temperature of the water even a little bit. The key to amp restriction is the waveform as there must be an equal amount of negative and positive voltage which one can see on the oscilloscope. This is where I find most people don't know how to actually use their oscilloscopes or even interpret the readings their oscilloscopes are showing them. This is the part of physics most people either don't know or failed to pay attention to while in college level physics classes. Here is a video that goes over how to find out the total work done: [size=78%]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q3Cw6dzSZ0[/size]


In this simple video he goes over what to do with negative areas under the curve. This applies to what is being shown on the oscilloscope as positive reading indicate current flowing through the system. Negative reading means it took energy from the system so if with one pulse the positive and negative pulses are equal the total energy flowing through the system is zero for that pulse. Then Meyer set up a series of pulses each will put both negative and positive pulses to the water fuel capacitor and again if those energy are equal in their voltages the net energy that flows through the water bath is zero. I got it really close to zero as the voltage of the positive pulses was around 5 volts more than the negative voltages. So the total work, or in our case current flow, is dependent on the how well one can get the negative and positive voltages to be equal. The area under the curve shown on the oscilloscopes shows the current that is flowing through the system be it negative or positive readings and one must know how to interpret these readings.
This is why when people say that my waveforms are incorrect I know they simply just don't understand how to make sense of this technology as they just don't have enough education under their belts to be trying to solve this technology. For they don't understand for every one pulse sent to the VIC transformer you get two pulses in return one being negative and the other being positive in that order as that is how Meyer set up the transformer in the voltage intensifier circuit. Since the current is being canceled out with a balanced waveform the only thing left to do work is voltage. Those people showing you their waveforms with nothing but positive areas above the zero line are pushing current through the water bath as that is physics and if you can get them to take temperature readings over time you will find out that the water bath heats up depending on how much current they are flowing through the water bath. However they know this and will more than likely refuse to take temperature readings over time as that doesn't square up with what witnesses to Meyer's technology say about setup as it ran for over an hour while they observed it. These eye witnesses tell the water temperature did not change like it should have done if it was standard electrolysis taking place and know you all should have an idea why.

So, in Max Miller's recent "Meyer conference" when he talks about the waveform and how I am doing things wrong he actually contradicts himself later on when going over what Meyer said about the technology in the very same video. The video is still up if you all don't believe me but I am sure it will be pulled down once news of what I said here gets to his ears. In my view many of you are like Max in that you simply don't have what it takes to solve this technology education wise but are too bullheaded to admit it. And furthermore in your arrogance you get in the way of people like me whom have chosen to make use of the scientific method and now have the results to back up what they say scientifically. Thus in my view you all (if the shoe fits wear it) do the work for those that sell energy and want this technology to never see the light of day free of charge.


I know my words can seem harsh but it's the truth and sometimes words like these have to be said or the evil ones win.


Take care and know my aims are for a world with this technology.

[MasterPlaster]

Thank you Edward for imparting more information.
This the thread is "Stanley Meyer Explained" So, I am here to find out the explanation!
After so many pages it was time to get a bit of explaination.I am not surprised they throw spanner in your wheels.  I was following your thread years back on
the forum  that shut down. Unfortunately that happed before you spill the beans!
I am not going to spend time watching MM. I have seen so many time waisters over the yearsthat I can sniff them a continent away.
There was a time that I just wished someone showed me how to replicate Meyer's work.Eventually I came to the conclusion I have to do the work myself because the situationhas been blind leading the blind.
I have enough technical ability to get to the buttom of this and am prepared to make myshare of mistakes.

[h20power]

Thank you Edward for imparting more information.
This the thread is "Stanley Meyer Explained" So, I am here to find out the explanation!After so many pages it was time to get a bit of explanation.
I am not surprised they throw spanner in your wheels.  I was following your thread years back on
the forum  that shut down. Unfortunately that happened before you spill the beans!

Your welcome, I just hope all of this translates to actual monetary support for my efforts to bring out this technology    as someone else might get it wrong    more than likely. 


In the past I generally shared information as I learned it in real time but after all the constant attacks I started just keeping things to myself as who has time to constantly be disrespected time and time again over and over again in a almost non stop manor?! If I shared something it was a result of actually doing the work not just making things up out of thin air. This is why my explanations actually hold up to the test of time and my story doesn't undergo some radical change thus remaining consistent as time passes by. That video interview done by John Fraser should more than prove that is the truth about my work towards solving the science behind this technology as my story really hasn't changed in well over 7 years as I just keep adding to it as I learned more about how things actually worked from actual trial and error experiments following the scientific method.


Now that I have explained how to actually read and interpret things the oscilloscope shows one can clearly see that these waveforms are pushing current through the water bath as after all the oscilloscope is just a tool to aid us in seeing what is actually going on.

[h20power]

That last waveform is actually correct but the transformer was over loaded which is from Max Miller and again you can clearly see he is pushing amps through the water bath. For the most part we have the voltage intensifier circuit wired up the same way but as you can see my setup isn't overloading the transformer. Now my waveform isn't fully balanced but it is doing like it should be doing in attempting to restrict the amps by the waveform alone. Now you all should be able to see just where I got the idea of how to go about drawing the waveforms I showed earlier as those drawings are from actual experimental results and not just something I made up out of thin air.


Later on I got the waveform to be within 5 volts with the positive being greater than the negative voltage but I didn't take any photos of it as I was focused on taking the amperage readings as I got both the positive and negative voltages to be very close to being the same. The readings I observed were between 1.0-0.3 mA using a inline analog micro amp meter. This technology is very complicated but once done correctly well worth the effort.

[Jimboot]

This video on above cloud extreme electrical discharge to the ionosphere I thought may have context here. https://youtu.be/H8HpKIUdki8