Stanley Meyer Explained

[MasterPlaster]

Hi Edward

I have just made one of my ideas public. It is about a new kind of WFC.
If you like you can take a look here:
https://open-source-energy.org/?topic=3500.msg53812#msg53812

Regards

M

[h20power]

This video on above cloud extreme electrical discharge to the ionosphere I thought may have context here. https://youtu.be/H8HpKIUdki8

Basically when I look at what mainstream science seems to understand about thunderstorms and their total effect on the air I find that they really don't understand them all that well: [size=78%]https://www.theclimatepress.com/thunderstorms-and-lightning-in-a-changing-climate[/size]


If you look at what they don't talk about it becomes clear that a technology such as this can exist without their ability to being able to understand it. Thunderstorms are the earths natural air cleaners when it comes to greenhouse gases like methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen monoxide, and so many more as thunderstorms break these molecules down. Us humans have upset the balance by putting far too much air pollutants into the air than the ecosystem can cope with.
I do find it interesting that some scientist do understand that thunderstorms break the bonds of Nitrogen, Oxygen, and some even Water molecules but can't make the connection of the role thunderstorms play in the earth's ecosphere. It is this lack of understanding that has lead us down to this dark path we are on as when solutions like this come out those scientist that don't understand this, and many that depend on their funding from fossil fuel industries, all team up to put these technologies down. It's just interesting to see that some scientist do understand that thunderstorms have the ability to break down molecules and others haven't a clue but as I stated this lack of understanding is the problem as it leads to funding problems when technologies like these try to be used to solve our climate change problems.


In time I see this technology coming out but it seems those times will be really hard when it does for all life on the planet. It seems to be humanities fate to suffer through these climate change disasters in our future as they are too slow to change and thus will be weeded out like everything else in nature that is too slow to change. Just imagine if this technology had been accepted back in 1968 when it first hit the scene what would our earth look like and how would it have changed our lives? Cars running around cleaning the air as they are driven instead of polluting it and everyone being in full control of their own energy needs no longer having to pay to power their automobiles or homes is just what this technology will do once it makes it into our lives. But the lack of support for this technology is what will slow it's adoption into our lives and I feel not until people are actually facing starvation will they then move to support people like me. I must thus be patient and wait until those moments arrive which seems to be my part in all of this.


For those whom wish to give their support before times get truly hard they can do so here: https://www.gofundme.com/energytothepeople


Much thanks to all those whom choose to willingly support my efforts to bring this technology into the marketplace 
[size=78%] [/size]

[sm0ky2]

There's a gap between the ionosphere, and the part of the atmosphere which
has enough atoms and molecules to store a significant charge.


This area can be considered an insulator.
An opposite charge is induced in the upper atmosphere.
Far above cloud formation.


Because the ionic wind is variant, the strength of the charge can drop drastically
When this occurs And there still exists a large charge in the upper atmosphere,
An upwards discharge event can occur.
And even more rarely, when there is a great enough difference between the two charges
A 'beam' of charge can be observed shooting off into space

[kolbacict]

And in the simplest construction, for example, like this one, will it be possible to get gas in excess of the Faraday law? (over current) If everything is done correctly.At least twice.So that you can fix, measure?
I have not succeeded yet.

[onepower]

Kolbacict
The diagram shown is from the "practical guide to free energy devices" which is incorrect so far as I know. You would be much better off to look at Stanley Meyers original patents and work from there.