Stanley Meyer Explained

[alan]

http://www.ogohho.com/index.do 
AE sells these quality hho components for little, even an obd-2 communicator.

[kolbacict]

Thank you ... But this is all according to Faraday.
And I wanted according to Mayer, or at least according to Mitchell ...

[alan]

True, but many components are useful for the VIC method too.If you want to understand how the VIC works, look up hyiq on yt. All cop>1 devices are based on the same principle and he explored and explained it.

[h20power]

Thank you ... But this is all according to Faraday.
And I wanted according to Mayer, or at least according to Mitchell ...

Good to see that you caught that Alan was leading you in the wrong direction which is away from Meyer's technology and back into Dr. Faraday's technology. Just note that what Meyer did is practically the opposite of what Dr. Faraday did.
The VIC circuit as a whole includes the transformer, the blocking diode, and the water capacitor, as well as the pulsing circuit but it just drives the Voltage Intensifier Circuit. The transformer must be matched almost perfectly for the load it is to drive following standard transformer building techniques. The primary change is the capacitor is variable from around 30 pf to 1 pf if you built the cell to Meyer's specifications. It will start off with 30 pf and drop when it starts to produce gases as those gases will displace the dielectric medium which causes the capacitance to go down. This will require higher frequencies to be used to keep the system in resonance which is the job of the PLL part of the circuitry.


These transformers are the hardest part of this technology to get right as you just don't slap some wire on a bobbin form and call it a day. It must be matched which takes a lot of trial and error. I posted Meyer's turn count data for the transformer he used to drive the injectors already so I'll leave it to you to find it and read those numbers. Note when changing things as I have in order to have the transformer drive a WFC everything changes as the specs for the injector transformer will not have enough power to drive a WFC. So I had to stumble around through a lot of trial and error testing until I got the power factor high enough for the transformer to be able to drive a larger load. Basically I had to change the wire sizes and redo practically everything from scratch. Once I started getting high voltage to be applied to the WFC I knew I was heading in the right direction and not until that bit showing how to use Meyer's formulas came out did I have what I needed to finish this technology. Again I have already shared this information in this thread.


In a way it's much like a car's stereo system if the amp isn't rated to handle a 1 ohm load it will overheat and not be able to drive the load effectively at all. The power that the amp is built for must match the load it is to drive. As speakers move the load they present to the amplifier changes so they too are a variable load just as the WFC is a variable capacitor. Thus these transformer must be built to handle the load they are expected to power. For the most part in what I see people doing is not even trying to figure out how to go about matching the transformers they make to match the load they want to power with it. This is one of the primary reasons why I cation people not to start making changes to this technology when it comes to the WFC specs as to do so changes the load they present to the transformer. We only have little information to go off of that is useful from what Meyer did and to keep constantly making changes to the different parts of this technology before one has a chance to learn how it works is not a good idea. So, again just like a car amplifier that is rated for a 4 ohm load you must get speakers that are at 4 ohms for the amp to drive. Now this amp can power 8 ohm speakers effectively but not 2 ohm speakers.


Now for the changes I made was just like trying to force a 8 ohm rated amp to power a 1 ohm load so I had to build a stronger amplifier as a result. The new transformer I made is a lot beefier than Meyer's injector transformer as the load it is to power is far greater than Meyer's injectors. I hope this all makes sense to you as I can't tell you how to build a transformer to power a load that isn't the same as the one I am using. This is the true trial and error testing we all must go through to match the power source to the load we intend on driving with it. You are going to have to learn to make use of programs like this: [size=78%]http://www.learningaboutelectronics.com/Articles/Impedance-matching-calculator.php?fbclid=IwAR2j3HO74GEKPfHouc0U-W_143jBaFV_ZordF1BzW84AyS_-6BIfY8m8kME[/size] as there is no other way to go about building and designing these transformers to match the load they are intended to drive. And again I warn all of you that if you made changes to what Meyer did the results your transformer will have to drive your unique load will be a lot different from what Meyer used. But the scientific concepts I shared with all of you will still hold as the goal is to break the bonds of the water molecules by way of taking away the electrons from the atoms that make up the water molecules which is how mother nature goes about breaking the bonds of the water molecules.


As far as I know these transformers are the hardest part to build correctly and understand just what it is you are doing and why. So, with that being said best of luck to you all as I have done my part in sharing the science behind this technology. But as you can see there is still more to learn.


Take care,
Edward

[lota]

Hello,[/size] how much hho L / min did you generate at how much power? greeting [/size]