Stanley Meyer Explained

[CrazyEwok]

I will not get into a discussion about religion on a science board. BUT i never said anything about the validity of your idea i simply said that your use of GOD either implies that you believe it is the be all and end all way... not slightly ignorant at all... or that it is holy and is greater than man kind... still not slightly ignorant at all... so take your ignorant stick and point it somewhere else... Oh BTW when light hits crystals it slows down and changes direction... you still loose some of the energy... there has been plenty of research into it.

[Outlawstc]

i'm not even going to dignify your "GOD" theory with an answer..

lol gods kingdom isnt just this little one planet my friend.. without sun theres no life. without earth theres no life  its vice versa.. .... its funny how they call the bible the holy bible.. while positve light energy are called holes.. its funny how the bible refer to being pure (neutral).. its funny how you can see how different charged substances effect peoples lifes.. such as alcohol which is a acid (neg) make people feel weighted down on this neutral planet.. its funny how people during the time of atlantis lived to be over 200 years old. they must of been taking synthetic over the counter cures to huh? lol

use of GOD either implies that you believe it is the be all and end all way... not slightly ignorant at all... or that it is holy and is greater than man kind... still not slightly ignorant at all

"or that it is holy and is greater than man kind."  nothin could ever be bigger then man kind not even god powers huh..  not the powers that make earth spin and support life.. never.  light isnt a need for man we could live in the dark.. we dont need plants.  they dont need energy from god to grow

stan didn't relate this to god on his bussiness logo because he thought it wasnt connected.. never

simple apology wouldnt been strait but u square just like everyone else that cant figure out how to step out side of it.  not implying to anyone else hear just speaking of in population general.. should of just kept your negativity to yourself.. 

there has been plenty of research into it.

so your telling me people have experimented with the set up i have drawn out?. they used stainless 304.. insulated it from ground.. about 20 by 20 feet? and since its slowing light down and multiplying wouldnt that be a low frequency amplification??? does tesla not say low frequencies have more power??,   and the vacuum cold state.. thats not adding to the vacuum on electrons threw a load? and sunlights radiant light could never be powerful enough to power anything..

they say black solar panel's are not efficient because they don't aborb lower frequencies  it is the hot process and the versa way of makeing them. allways 2 ways to skin a cat.

[h20power]

Okay Outlawstc and to all else this concerns,
The only thing anyone reading this thread should be concerned about is building the Gas Processor, injectors, and matching electronics. I left a lot of work to be done for all of you, either get busy building or shut up. I do not need anyone trying to tell me how Stanley Meyer did what he did for I already know the answer and I did the right thing and posted the solution for all of you. Sure it will take some getting use to seeing the math in action and a lot of studying to understand the math, chemistry, and physics concepts.

I didn't learn how Stanley Meyer did what he did by looking at the patents, I learned by looking away from the patents and just taking core concepts. Learning how a lightining storm truly works for starters, learning the full meaning of capacitance, and magentic fields. Learning about Kelvin genarators and Taylor cones. Understanding just what a dielectric is and how they behave in a capacitive set up. Also learning how to add up energy levels, rates of reactions, gas laws, the physical properties of water, and self ionization of water. Learning the nature of the hydronium ion, learn states of matter, the tripple point, and how to read phase diagrams, and the list goes on and on.

In the end I figured out how Stanley Meyer did what he did to use water as a source of fuel, and in doing so I also figured out how Dr. Dingel, Bob Boyce, and others systems work. It has been 11 years since the death of Stanley Meyer, and to the best of my knowlege no one in the whole world has made these mathmatical comparisons of energy content with gasoline & water the way I have. If anyone doesn't understand any part of what I posted then use the internet for what it is best suited for, teaching, and teach yourselves any part you don't understand. The first key thing everyone has to do is learn how to ask and answer question, this is the best example you are ever going to get of how to go about asking and answering questions on your own: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/285.html if after you see this video and you still don't know how to ask and answer questions just quit and find something else to do with your time. For after watching that video and you still don't know how to go about the process of information gathering you will be wasting your time and mine.

I will be honest I am not interested in what you think or how you think it works with concern to the water for fuel technologies. The only thing I am interested in is that you learn the concepts of what I have posted and start becoming energy independent as a result. Right now each and every person reading this should already be putting together ideas of how they can apply this technology to their everyday lives, and building prototypes to do so. If not, what are you doing? waiting for me to put out my prototype so it can be copied when you should be building an understanding of your own? Or are you waiting for an entertainment video of a car running on water when that in itself will be called a fake. The math is proof of concept for it stands alone and follows all the known rules of science. For even someone with diminished capacity can tell that 6k > 5k  and those numbers are the rounded off of the energy levels of gasoline and atomized water+primed air gases(4th level)+recirculated exhaust gases, just as Stanley Meyer tells to do in his patents. I don't want to hear how you think it works for I already know how it works, either you get busy freeing yourselves from energy enslavement or get busy dieing!

h2opower

[triffid]

I am glad to see this thread is doing so well.I have found a way to pull water out of thin air and hope we can  come up with cars that refuel themselves by pulling water out of the air at night and then using solar heat during the day to pull water out of those crystals.Couple this with recycling the steam that comes out of the tailpipe.You would have a car you never need to refuel.If you other guys work out how to burn water as a fuel.Then these cars have a chance to become reality.Triffid

[Farrah Day]

This is getting sad. What the hell are you people on?

Outlaw is now throwing religion into the mix - I guess that is to conveniently fill in the missing bits that his brain can't handle or science seemingly can't explain! 

H2O, maths is not proof of concept. The maths is simply figures from which you are forming your concept.

Proof of concept is having a working unit powering a ICE.... don't think you've got one of these have you?

I know exactly what to think about the likes of Dinkie, Kinesis and Outlaw, but I'm really not sure what to make of you H2O.  Seems to me like your just shouting your mouth off as many have before, making out that you have all the answers, but curiously you seem to expect others to build the unit!  I've heard it all before, people are good at talking the talk - yet to see anyone walk the walk.  And I for one wont be holding my breath while you play with your maths.

What I'd like to know is just where all the power to continually ionise oxygen is coming from in the first place?

Personally, like Meyer before you, I don't for one minute think that you understand the science involved in what your are suggesting, let alone have the electronics know-how to build a proof-of-concept unit.

But don't let that stop you... please, go ahead and prove me wrong!