Stanley Meyer Explained

[h20power]

This is getting sad. What the hell are you people on?

Outlaw is now throwing religion into the mix - I guess that is to conveniently fill in the missing bits that his brain can't handle or science seemingly can't explain! 

H2O, maths is not proof of concept. The maths is simply figures from which you are forming your concept.

Proof of concept is having a working unit powering a ICE.... don't think you've got one of these have you?

I know exactly what to think about the likes of Dinkie. Kinesis and Outlaw, but I'm really not sure what to make of you H2O.  Seems to me like your just shouting your mouth off as many have before, making out that you have all the answers, but curiously you seem to expect others to build the unit!  I've heard it all before, people are good at talking the talk - yet to see anyone walk the walk.  And I for one wont be holding my breath while you play with your maths.

What I'd like to know is just where all the power to continually ionise oxygen is coming from in the first place?

Personally, like Meyer, I don't for one minute think that you understand the science involved in what your are suggesting, let alone have the electronics know-how to build a proof-of-concept unit.

But don't let that stop you... please, go ahead and prove me wrong!

No. You teach yourself look up and fully understand a corona discharge and that in itself will answer your question, if not, quit. Since you couldn't answer your own question after I posted the video, I think you should just give up and/or quit. I have, more than anyone elses post on this site, looked at your post more than any others. Just like you towards me, I couldn't make you out, what was your goals, what where your asperations, what drives you to write

And again, No! You prove me wrong! For that forces you to go over all the math and comparisons made of my research on the water for fuel technology. Make no misstake about it, you come over here and challange me your going to have to do it with the methods of science. Your going to have to ask yourself and answer the very same questions I ask myself, and this question is most important. "How did Stanley Meyer run a 1.6L aluminium engine with an hho production rate of 7L/min.?" It is that question that lies at the heart of me figuring out how Stanley Meyer did what he did. Now you answer this question as best as you can if you find yourself unable to answer the question then quit and find something else to do with your life for you are wasting my time as with the time of others forced to read your post due to trying to figure you out .

[Outlawstc]

What I'd like to know is just where all the power to continually ionise oxygen is coming from in the first place?

see my mind is like legos in side.. i can SEE what i build.. i can see its reactions i can see displacements.. i can see deflection.. my mind is fully capable of understand natural forces.
im gonna give you 2 answers and you will still call me crazy..

stans delflection occurs in the alternator system due the physical rotation energy of the alternator version.  it can consume up to 8 hp i would say at the most.. it is creating what we would call a circuit.. itself.. since its producing gas, the gas is being burnt, that cause's the mechanical rotation force which is then returning back to production.. so theres a loop of energy recycling there.. stans cell is creating a ANTI GRAVITY atmosphere between excitors.. electrons have the fall feeling toward the positive while positve has a feeling of falling toward the negative.. it is a duality force in action.. to understand duality force you got to know how time works,... its all relative. 

as for the transformer version it is capable of the deflection of electrons and the electron bounce phenomenon due to the type of charge going threw the primary winding.. it is using turbulent amps.. the ontly type you probly understand.. since non turbulent isnt defined yet? i think we should call them outlaws since these amps seem to  not exist..   see i have found the light.. i know how this world works.. you cant see how the tradewinds at the equator  resemble how stans low and high volts(pressure) can interact as a bi direction trade.. you cant see what makes a hurricanne occur and how a hurricane is like turbulent amps in a wire.. im as crazy as they come farrah day.. i hang out with my wang out.. and theres nothin better in life then finding the light.

i understand this tech so well i see how it reacts with human nature.. we live on the northern hemisphere.. sine the matter of earth has a positve charge on this side all the electrons tend to condense in the northern hemisphere.. they get denser the further north u go from the equator.. ever wounder why it seems like all the complexity seems to be in the north? ever wounder why snow flakes become more complex as you go north?  ever wounder why colors are more vivid in the southern hemisphere? look at the birds and animals.. how come we dont have them here? theres less electrons in the southern hemisphere since it repels them .. the earth is naturaly holding the charge plants roots want.. and they are getting way more light..so they grow quicker.. man did you hear about that war australia was in? nope because theres no such talk of that stuff down there.   
now ask your self what the pyramids got to do with all this.. ask your self what the point of all the gold in them was.. ask why they are built at 30deg north lat and 30 deg. longitude..  ask why there linear placement resembles trade winds curve.. ask why are planet is slowly loosing its tilt.. could the pyramids charges of kept the earth in a seasonal resonance?  does there linear placement determine the speed of earths rotation??/ im crazy dont listen to my jargon. lol  this brain of mine i just dont know how it comes to clairty maybe its because i dont follow all the studies that contradict this tech.. hmm or maybe i have a little einstien in me??? this tech has shown me anti gravity, possibilities to quantum mechanics. and overunity as a civilization.. where everybodys  rich.. and the rich i speak of isnt money.. but the real gold knowledge..  look up in the sky.. we rich.

[johnbostick]

Outlaw, 
I don't think there could be anyway farrah days could argue against that logic. 

[Farrah Day]

Well H2O, I've now concluded that you're just as misguided as most of the others around here - what a lot of nonsense you talk!

Why would I have to prove you wrong?

I didn't find Meyer very credible, I find you less so. Proof is in the pudding, not the recipe. Once you have a working model you can then put an end to any speculation and skepticism. I, or anyone else does not need to prove you wrong, you simply need to prove yourself right, by building a working model.  Afterall, you made a point of coming over here shouting about how you know how to do it - it's for you to back up you claims, not for us to disprove you. Besides you haven't actually got anything to disprove yet have you... it's all just talk!

I say again, you have nothing but theories until you put your ideas into practise and build a working - proof of concept - model.  And again, where is all the energy to continually ionise oxygen coming from in the first place? 

And do you really expect an oxygen ion missing half a dozen electrons to react with a hydrogen ion? If so how?  Do you expect to get water as a by-product? If so, how?

Exactly what chemical reaction do you expect to get from heavily ionised oxygen and hydrogen? How can they even react?

I don't think you've really thought this through. Gases ionised to extremes won't react as normal, they need too many electrons to stabilise. Like Meyer before you, it all sounds good, but the science simply does not add up!

Outlaw sweetie, has the doctor changed your medication by any chance... because you seem to be tripping on something?

[h20power]

Well H2O, I've now concluded that you're just as misguided as most of the others around here - what a lot of nonsense you talk!

Why would I have to prove you wrong?

I didn't find Meyer very credible, I find you less so. Proof is in the pudding, not the recipe. Once you have a working model you can then put an end to any speculation and skepticism. I, or anyone else does not need to prove you wrong, you simply need to prove yourself right, by building a working model.  Afterall, you made a point of coming over here shouting about how you know how to do it - it's for you to back up you claims, not for us to disprove you. Besides you haven't actually got anything to disprove yet have you... it's all just talk!

I say again, you have nothing but theories until you put your ideas into practise and build a working - proof of concept - model.  And again, where is all the energy to continually ionise oxygen coming from in the first place? 

And do you really expect an oxygen ion missing half a dozen electrons to react with a hydrogen ion? If so how?  Do you expect to get water as a by-product? If so, how?

Exactly what chemical reaction do you expect to get from heavily ionised oxygen and hydrogen? How can they even react?

I don't think you've really thought this through. Gases ionised to extremes won't react as normal, they need too many electrons to stabilise. Like Meyer before you, it all sounds good, but the science simply does not add up!

Outlaw sweetie, has the doctor changed your medication by any chance... because you seem to be tripping on something?

I can tell you have no idea how speech and debates work, my argument is already out, now the burden of proof lies with you since you are the one with the alternative point of view.

Where is the answer to the question? That one is a bit to hard for you? Like I said before you are just a waste of my time since you can't speak in terms of science. These are ionic reactions, but again you have no knowledge of what that is so it's pointless to talk to you. You still didn't answer your own question after I gave you a hit as to where to find the answer learning what a corona discharge is and how it works every aspect of it.

You are not smart enough to take on the likes of me so go call on some of your butt bodies to help you out, or take the easy way out and quit. For what is your purpose here anyway? What drives you to say and write the things you do? Is it defending your honor? Is it you have a better way of reaching energy independence, but have opt to keep that information all to yourself? Why are you here?

h2opower.