Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

Started by X00013, March 17, 2009, 06:27:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 45 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cloxxki

Mylow's alu rotors are roughly 2-dimensional. Flat and round.

Supposing these dampening effects are indeed what makes his setups to allow for optimal magnets layouts resulting in spin...should the rotor not be a shaped to pin-point that dampening effect exactly where we want it? I'm thinking of a roughly fan shaped rotor, the thick blades offset from the rotor magnet groups.

BEP

Maybe so but I'll stick to making it work first  :)

pinestone

Quoteauthor=BEP
That requires the flow of electric current

You are wrong. A magnet will induce torque. The only difference between an electromagnet and a magnet is you can turn off an electromagnetic field with the flick of a switch.

Quote
Yes, but how can this produce a non-zero torque on the disc?

A magnetic field wants to be at rest (conserved). Think of a ball rolling downhill. Torque disappears when the affected domains reach their lowest magnetic potential.

Quote
I love that person's work but until I see how those photos are produced I can only assume it is for the same reasons magnetic fields look weird on a particular TV screen. This is fine for showing the separation called the Bloch wall but [I suspect] it also requires the application of moving charges.

I'm that person, and you are viewing my work (and the work of others).
My lens is a simple, passive device that responds to magnetism at the molecular level using nanotechnology. The images are un-touched, using only a digital camera.

And, a micro-grid CRT (TV) is basically a particle accelerator. Quite useful for studying magnetic fields.
http://www.particlephysics.ac.uk/news/picture-of-the-week/picture-archive/the-particle-accelerator-in-your-home.html

Quote
I'll agree this may be possible. The magnetic-only equivalent of a worm-drive? There have been a few published experiments indicating a simple magnetic dipole is a vortex like structure. Howard wasn't the only one. All indicated it was still static, no rotation.

Again, this image I'm referencing is one taken through a Flux Resonator.
This is a special lens I built for a grad student in Kentucky.
http://www.nanomagnetics.us/photonic_dipole_contours_v17u7b.pdf

He's performed many experiments for his fellow students, instructors & professors. The torque from a magnet is real. You are viewing the lowest potential of the field.

Quote
The only place where rotation is apparent is during the transition between the Bloch and Neel walls. Since that has only been seen at the micro level I'm having trouble applying the concept here.

My lens is rendering the field at the molecular level, not the micro level.
Look again & you will see how this new technology reveals more detail at another level...

Magnetic torque is quite apparent in this microscopic view of chains composed of ferro-nanoparticles move with the field.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n1_6x3kEP8

Quote
The reason for my rant remains. People need to understand the fact that the magnetic flux is not produced by a magnet. The field is but that is like saying you are measuring a measurement. The lines don't exist unless you throw iron filings or some other such material in the mix. This solves the paradox and explains how permanent magnets are magnetic without current flow from one end to the other.

I agree. There are no 'lines' of flux. There are only concentrations of the field at specific distances from the Bloch wall.

Quote
There are great and widely accepted arguments to counter my statements. No need to repeat them here. We all understand them. To me, the fact remains a magnet to the magnetic flux is the same as a lens is to light.
Your statement is one reason there has been little progress in the understanding of magnetism. If you think everything has already been figured out, you're wrong.
NOBODY knows what a magnetic field is. It remains one of the mysteries of our universe.


dixiepnum

now that we're all following 3 threads (pita)....

I emailed sandsmachine.com to see if they could machine a base to go with their aluminium plates, and package them for sale...

we'll see what happens...

pinestone

Quote from: dixiepnum on May 06, 2009, 08:53:50 AM
now that we're all following 3 threads (pita)....

I emailed sandsmachine.com to see if they could machine a base to go with their aluminium plates, and package them for sale...

we'll see what happens...

sorry for the rant...I'll stay on topic