Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim

[ALFPARTS]

My, a lot happens while I sleep. I guess I'll have to stop doing that.

ALFPARTS, you showed a video of a train, and some other items in a certain lab, and you asked if there were questions. I asked if anything shown would close the loop, and you said, YES, the train.
I challenged you, and you finally said, well, not THAT train, the original train is in HJ's lab and Bedini kept a different train--but what it boils down to is that the answer to my question is "NO, none of them", not what you said.
You said that Tom Bearden researched the HJ motor and implied that he vetted it. I posted a direct quote from Tom himself describing the nature and duration of his "research" with HJ's rotary device which, shall we say, was a little less emphatic than your representation. I asked you how long Tom watched the motor run (I say, from Tom's own words, 15 minutes max) and you don't answer clearly. Someone else asks you how long YOU saw HJ's motor run and you don't answer at all.
You said in another earlier post that Mylow had NOT come up with 10 (or was it 11) different magnet configurations. I asked you to justify this, since by my count he HAS made that many different ones work, and you came up with the "Hail Mary Pass" of all explanations: They may look different and have different physical characteristics, but on some esoteric plane all his configurations are the same and are just like HJ's train.
You haven't come up with one shred of proof or support for your contentions, you ask for links that you could easily find for yourself (here's one for you: www.google.com , and here's another: www.youtube.com ) and you flame experienced researchers like RB "by accident", you've posted no real data of your own, and you seem to get all excited about circular SMOTs that can't even get out of their own way.
You came out of nowhere a couple weeks ago yet you are setting yourself up as a magnet motor expert, even though it is clear that you are a HJ disciple, at the very least.

Have I summarized the situation adequately?

And, instead of addressing issues, you join the flamers.

So, I have another question. Whassup witchoo, anyway?

Tinsel,

Your representation of the written text is skewed and thus the representation of the facts expressly implied by that that text is skewed as a result. This indicates either the lack of ability to convey information accurately or the blantant intention of spreading disinformation. Your videos and accompanying narratives also indicate likewise. There is another name for such actions.

You see me appear out of the blue, as you say, because I decided to temporarily join this forum for the purpose of finding those who want to do good in this world. However, I didn't just jump off the boat as some might mistakenly think or say, based on my member status. There is no obligation to prove myself to anyone, especially here in this forum or to anybody for that matter.

I do not have time to argue with every sociopathic paid government shill that comes along. I am simply here to collect the co-venture of worthy individuals who want the information that I have and that which I have unique access to. Sorry, but I don't share it with just every single person I meet. Can you read between the lines without misrepresenting the facts as to what was said here?


Also my sudden appearance here does not mean that I just got off the boat.
My work concerning the actual mechanical construction phase of these motors started long ago and ended about ten years ago. Been there, done that, as they say. When I see the motor running after thirty years the thrill is still there but it is largely replaced now by objective caution. This motor that everyone is fretting over is merely a toy from a practical mechanical standpoint. Very few people understand why it  needs to be replicated even in it's simplest form. This is the first time that I have admitted such to any forum.

Further, I am not a 'disciple' of Howard Johnson as you say. If I were good enough spiritually maybe I'd be a disciple of God though. Yes, I believe in God but I am not some cult follower of crop circles or other such things, though I do have my pro opinions about such things as it pertains to technological awareness.

As for my attacks: I feel that they are warranted. You have no idea what has taken place and I seriously doubt that you have had business dealings with RB or TB. You might consider RB to be an exceptional researcher. I think that he is a brilliant man. I also think that TB is likewise a brilliant man, even after his academic scandal.  However, 'exceptional' and 'brilliant' are not synonymous with 'moral'

[RunningBare]

I think that tells us enough about you, have a nice life.

I do not have time to argue with every sociopathic paid government shill that comes along.

[Bobbotov]

I think that tells us enough about you, have a nice life.

BTW, where is the sociopathic paid government shill forum again? Oh, that's right over at Steorn.com.

[ALFPARTS]

Tinsel,

Your representation of the written text is skewed and thus the representation of the facts expressly implied by that that text is skewed as a result. This indicates either the lack of ability to convey information accurately or the blantant intention of spreading disinformation. Your videos and accompanying narratives also indicate likewise. There is another name for such actions.

You see me appear out of the blue, as you say, because I decided to temporarily join this forum for the purpose of finding those who want to do good in this world. However, I didn't just jump off the boat as some might mistakenly think or say, based on my member status. There is no obligation to prove myself to anyone, especially here in this forum or to anybody for that matter.

I do not have time to argue with every sociopathic paid government shill that comes along. I am simply here to collect the co-venture of worthy individuals who want the information that I have and that which I have unique access to. Sorry, but I don't share it with just every single person I meet. Can you read between the lines without misrepresenting the facts as to what was said here?


Also my sudden appearance here does not mean that I just got off the boat.
My work concerning the actual mechanical construction phase of these motors started long ago and ended about ten years ago. Been there, done that, as they say. When I see the motor running after thirty years the thrill is still there but it is largely replaced now by objective caution. This motor that everyone is fretting over is merely a toy from a practical mechanical standpoint. Very few people understand why it  needs to be replicated even in it's simplest form. This is the first time that I have admitted such to any forum.

Further, I am not a 'disciple' of Howard Johnson as you say. If I were good enough spiritually maybe I'd be a disciple of God though. Yes, I believe in God but I am not some cult follower of crop circles or other such things, though I do have my pro opinions about such things as it pertains to technological awareness.

As for my attacks: I feel that they are warranted. You have no idea what has taken place and I seriously doubt that you have had business dealings with RB or TB. You might consider RB to be an exceptional researcher. I think that he is a brilliant man. I also think that TB is likewise a brilliant man, even after his academic scandal.  However, 'exceptional' and 'brilliant' are not synonymous with 'moral'


Oh, I forgot something. Precision motors and solid state drive systems have been the core of my work for the last thirty-five years. My magmotor participation started in 1978 as being Howard's gopher.

[RunningBare]

You know, it's quite rude to quote yourself just because you think it might be missed a page ago.