The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[giantkiller]

@Kosh,
But still, on the trailing edge of the square wave you get a higher amplitude on the output signal. I see that as very encouraging. what are the specs there:
collector turns , gauge, solid or stranded, length of wire.
controllers turns, gauge, solid or stranded, length of wire. And I see the winding as coming from the clockwise edge starting underneath. The way you have or the reverse? Mine are the same way as yours. What direction is true?
And I also got a collector buckle where the controllers end up at. And thanks for the 200khz. I am at the 7.xhz range and haven't noticed anything. Could your 200khz be the right freq for the gauge and turns?
Man, that is one great looking coil! I noticed that SMs are too. That is encouraging also. I would hate to have something that works be fugly.

@all coil builders...
Very, very nice work and magnificently beautiful coils!

--giantkiller

[gn0stik]

Dr.Boren has a cogent argument that the positron is the fundamental unit of magnetic charge.
His theory thus assigns fundamentally diffrent natures to positive charge and negative charge.
In support of Dr.Boren, one should point out that the "positive" end of circuits can simply be "less negative" than the negative end.
In other words, the circuit works simply from higher accumulation of negative charges (the "negative" end) to a lesser accumulation of negative charges (the "positive" end)
Nowhere need there be positive charges (protons, positrons, etc.) to make the circuit work.

Problem with this is, that positrons are antimatter counterparts of electrons. They cannot exist in the same wire at the same time without obliterating eachother and a whole lot of mass in the direct vicinity. Therefor positrons cannot be the basic unit of magnetic charge since magnetic charge is everywhere, that would necessitate positrons being everywhere in the direct vicinity of electrons.

[mrd10]

To iterate on my post on tuning fork, (resonance freq) that i made on pos 261:-
check out the pdf, the frequency of tuning fork is dependant on the length, and also the spacing between the two prongs

I reckon by using this as a reference we can work out the circumference of the toroid.   I havent had a chance to look on the net for tuning fork parameters. I'll look into this as well, so basically the longer the prongs the lower the frequency. 95mm length = 329.6hz   and 85mm length = 440hz, you guys can buy these and see for yourselves. There cheap too.

ok working on the freq and lenght of tunning forks,:-

Music note A:-
85mm L = 440hz

Music Note E:-
95mm(L) = 329.6hz

Therefore the difference between these two are 110.4hz @ 10mm(L)

so:-

105mm(L) = 219.2hz

115mm(L) = 108.8hz

110.4hz/10mm(L) = 11.04hz, therefore:-

@ 7.28hz our length should be close to 125 mm, prob between 120 and 125mm
which is inbetween 4 and 5 inches, this is the diameter of the SM ring

I'm assuming here that the spacing will make a difference as well, but for simplistic sake we will keep that just under 2 inches.

Thats where i'll be starting anyway, now i guess I have to build a tuning cct to receive 7.28hz, or would the rings be part of that?

Cheers,

Dom   

[mrd10]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuning_fork


http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/music/tunfor.html

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/waves/tfl.html
This is an awesome link, once you understand this, i think SM, coil, infact i know it would become clearer, again listen to his first video that was made, and make the connection. From lesson 3:-

Lesson 3: Behavior of Sound Waves

Wave interference  is the phenomenon which occurs when two waves meet while traveling along the same medium. The interference of waves causes the medium to take on a shape which results from the net effect of the two individual waves upon the particles of the medium. As mentioned in a previous unit of The Physics Classroom, if two crests having the same shape meet up with one another while traveling in opposite directions along a medium, the medium will take on the shape of a crest with twice the amplitude of the two interfering crests. This type of interference is known as constructive interference.

Dom   

[hartiberlin]

Post from Mannix with info from the Professor:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,712.msg13688.html#msg13688

Kent

Maybe we can locate this John Sanchez and ask him questions about it ?

Or finally find a few people, who were in the other videos ?

Quote:
"With me was John Sanchez "

Who is this John Sanchez ?
Is he also from the university were
`the deceased
Roland Schinzinger
PhD.
29 Gilman St. Irvine, CA 92715-2703, Phone & FAX: (714) 786-7691
at his laboratory at the UCI campus
lived ?

Maybe someone living nearby this campus can check that out ?
Many thanks.