The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[Grumpy]

Marinov and others speculated that when speed of light is broken by rotation speed of magnetic field - field can no longer diverge.

After reading Marinov information, Steven's actions make more sense.

Anything Steven gives, I can connect to rogue physicist - seriously - only terminolgy is different - theory is the same.

Holy shit, Steven, I built a two channel tube amp about 20 years ago - hmm - wonder what happened to it...  tube amp is current amp - transistor amp is voltage.

I realize that you can not answer all questions.  Even no answer is good information.

Questions:

1. how much crap (noise, etc) can be tolerated in the control frequency?
2. would crystal oscillator be better means than variable?
3. is there a "detector" used?  crystal- natural or artificial, pyrite (Ferron), carborundum?
4. is there a coil arrangement that you did not show, but tried and was successful?
5. did you work with flat spiral coils - any results?
6. old radio attenas used only a couple of turns of wire - two or three - quote from 1921 "Principles Underlying Radio Communication", 2nd Ed. - Bureau of Standards, etc. "Coils of consisting of two or more turns of wire can be regarded as equivalent to vetical attennas of two or more times the height of the side of the coil." - what ratio would you recommend for an antenna?
7. the coil wrapped over all other coils is toroidal - it's B field lies within, but A field is active through center and around ring in direction of current (or is it opposite direction - I forget) - A-field is primary to B field and can be detected only when field is changing.  HAve you ever ran a loop through the center perpendicular to the toroid? Results?
8.  did you ever place a plant or leaf within the device center?
9. did you ever make early designs that were mechanical or mechanically excited (vibrated)?
10. are current and voltage in phase at output of collector? which lags? amount?
11. in the arrangement of 3 coils, wrapped with segmented coils, wrapped with one coil over - segments create one field or two counter-rotating fields?  What sort of control does overwrap coil provide?  Overwrap will offer large A-field in center with other fields - wouldn't this provide highly excited "direction" vector?
12. LR or LC?
13. buffer amplifier between load and oscillator
14. frequency multiplier?  biased? multiple frequency or harmonic?
15. unrelated - ever work with conical coils?  Tesla used this for very interesting transformer.
EDIT: 16. direction of rotation in northern hemisphere looking down? - not flipped over

We must all be careful, but I believe public forum is safer than private, so I will stay here.

To SM and LM - thanks for your time.

EDIT:
P.s. Tesla used the term "frequency" even when describing 1/4 wave pulses.  Tesla also developed a multiwave oscillator  and reworked the circuitry of Lakhovsky's version - fascinating!

EDIT-2:
quoting William Beaty - in this article: http://amasci.com/freenrg/audwall.html

A spike-impulse or "delta function" has an interesting frequency spectrum. It is composed of all possible sine waves of frequencies 1,2,3,4,etc.  When a large set of sine wave signals are all added together, they cancel out everwhere except at the zero location (origin) of the graph. There they add up to create a large transient-spike.

[c0mster]

Wow some disappointing letter from SM

It is obvious that most of the people reading the web site and experimenting know nothing

about reading a scope and understanding what perfect frequency is. They also have no concept

of how important the control frequencies are in order to make power from the collector.
It is obvious that most of the people trying to duplicate my experiment are not of the

intellectual caliper necessary to develop my technology or at the very least they need to

invest in some laboratory grade instruments in order to develop any progress.
I assumed that anyone working on technology this sophisticated would have a superior

knowledge of electronics and an understanding of PURE frequency output being a Necessity to

control the reactions going on inside the collector.
Please place this on the web site and let them know that if they do not have a more then

average understanding of electron flow then they should not endeavor to try and duplicate my

device because they do not stand a chance. I am tired of reading their disappointments

because they do not have the education or the knowledge necessary to duplicate my

technology.

Well I guess we we have not found someone of intellectual intelligence the can make SM's machine.
I have never seen anyone prove OU only a bunch patents, videos, write ups and rumors none that have been proven. Maybe SM is the only man smart enough to do it. Maybe I am stupid and am just living a pipe dream. If one thinks they are going to build a OU device overnight they are wrong. If the only reason you are trying any of this stuff is to get rich or famous then disappointment will be very frustrating. To me this is a hobby, everything I learn is important regardless if I succeed. I try to share what I learn for those who might see something I do not. Perhaps it would be better if I didn't post any ideas or findings in fear I am way of base and may be just someone who is of lesser intelligence. I hope I didn't leave a bad taste in anyones mouth with this post but I am in disgust that SM thinks we are a bunch of idiots.   

Cam               

[Hoppy]

Taking SM's comments about not being able to divulge too much information about his device, some may take his message as a diversion tactic to head experimenters into a safe direction away from the true working principle. Others may take this message to suggest that the device is more Homopolar in nature, totally passive picking up natural generated sine waves.  The marketing of this device will be the proof that the performance claims are valid. In the meantime lets enjoy experimenting and not getting too despondent about being told that we are not educated or intelligent enough!

[Vortex1]

c0mster:

  Don't let the condescending attitude of the letter get you down. A man's mind is as good as he believes it to be. We set up our own mental barricades and beliefs about what we can or cannot do.
    I believe that there is nothing made by man that we cannot understand if we have the time, patience, and a will to understand it. Lack of a willing student understanding the material points more towards either a poor teacher or one under certain constraints as may be the case here.
   An ordinary TV set is hundreds of times more complex than a TPU. Yet thousands of average servicemen and engineers were able to understand this complex device through education and training.
   Have fun in your hobby and remember that an amateur is "one who loves what he does". With time, the experience and finnesse of the art will come.
Let's get on with this thing !.......V

[allcanadian]

Hey Hoppy

"Taking SM's comments about not being able to divulge too much information about his device, some may take his message as a diversion tactic to head experimenters into a safe direction away from the true working principle"

Yes, and some may take his cryptic message as that of a half-wit who has no understanding of what is at stake regarding our future. Willing to gamble possibly millions of lives so he can buy new toys, He and his kind are pathetic they have learned nothing from history. If I have one hope it is one of us finds answers, discloses the technology to everyone and sends them to the poor house. It's funny all of these people, years later, always express regrets for being so stupid and always after it is too late, we may as well live in the stone ages.