The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[otto]

Hello all,

do you know why SM has to place two magnets on top of his TPU to start it?

He has 2 reed relays (that one with only 1 contact) at the output of 2 oscillators  in his TPU. With the one reed relay he activates one frequency and with the other reed relay the other frequency. Now I?m sure his TPU works with only 2 different frequencies and that means that the oscillator is always ON. I belief he uses a resonator or quarz circuit to get a low signal and this signal is amplified.

Regards

Otto

[otto]

Hi all
ctglabs

I know why the TPU stopps!
When you turn it in the wrong direction (180?) all control coils are acting in wrong direction. In an earlier post I mentioned that you must find out how to conect the oscillator on to say so 1 coil because if you connect wrong, you will have NO output. Or, to say in other way, the magnetic field must always go from the lower coil up to the top and then out in the air.  A little difficult for me to explain

Regards

Otto

[jacob]

Hello to all!

Like many others, I have been following this thread silently for a while and have now decided to step in and contribute to this great challenge of replicating SM's TPU. I have lots of ideas to contribute on the project and will release them one by one as time goes by. But I want to start by thanking Lyndsay Mannix for starting this thread and of course Steven Marks for revealing EVERYTHING we need to know in order to build this device. I also want to thank all of you who have contributed to this thead so far. When I got past page 40 of this thread, I tought that everything important had been said, but kept on reading anyhow. And I was glad to see that somewhere around page 170, things began to pick up and experimentation started to replace theory. The way this is going, I can confidently predict that before the end of the year, thanks to this collective effort, SM TPU WILL HAVE BEEN SUCCESSFULLY REPRODUCED!

Before going any further, I would however like so clarify one point which, although not directly linked with the technical aspect, is of prime importance:

It felt like we were having a discussion about politics and someone kept piping in with JESUS SAVES!!! 

To which the only response is, "perhaps, but what's that got to do with what we're talking about?"

What has is got do do? Very simple! Theocracy is the ultimate form of government. Man cannot govern himself because corruption keeps creeping in from everywhere. Our presence here is a clear evidence of this since we wouldn't have to seek for the truth if it wasn't for the fact that some people don't want free energy device to become a reality on this planet since it would threaten their own balance of power. 

Now, let's go back to the technical aspect ... I don't have much time this morning, but would however like to comment on this post from Otto:

do you know why SM has to place two magnets on top of his TPU to start it?

He has 2 reed relays (that one with only 1 contact) at the output of 2 oscillators  in his TPU. With the one reed relay he activates one frequency and with the other reed relay the other frequency. Now I?m sure his TPU works with only 2 different frequencies and that means that the oscillator is always ON. I belief he uses a resonator or quarz circuit to get a low signal and this signal is amplified.

I personnally dont believe that reed switches are involved here. First, it would complicate the design of the device since it would be far easier to insert a toggle switch than a reed switch and a magnet receptacle. I think that the answer is more in tune with an earlier post (#1050) made by Dave in which he confirms that a magnet placed near a bifilar coil in a transistor circuit changes the frequency of the oscillations. Steven's device is probably set up so that placing the magnet near a winding bring the resonant frequency to the desired value. Could be also that the magnet creates a circulator for the flow of the magnetic flux like someone else suggested earlier.

On the other hand, Otto is most certainly right when he says that the TPU works with only 2 different frequencies. This is made clear just by looking at the control unit of the larger TPU. But there is certainly no crystal involved here. Just a simple resonant circuit. Just remember that SM said that his unit was in a sense very similar to a radio receiver and that the signal didn't need to be amplified. Only a tuned resonant circuit can be involved here. Or two to be more precise.

I have lots of stuff to say about the kicks and the rotating magnetic field, but my time is up for now. Talk to you all later...

Regards,

Jacob.

[Dingus Mungus]

So, this takes us back to the vacuum tube.  Two signals of the same frequency but out of phase?  We must focus on this vacuum tube kick.  Once we find this kick, surely the path forward will be alot clearer?

I fully agree... If someone can explain how we can observe and measure this primary kick phenomenon, I will also be joining in on this experiment. I must stress though that it would be most beneficial if Mannix or Marks could explain this step, as it doesn't relate to the UEC's patent and may help one of us find the kick frequencies solution, but if everyone just buys a couple vacuum tubes and starts playing with frequencies our chances of accidentally discovering this 'kick' phenomenon are poor at best. I do hope they can give us this very tiny demonstration of the kick...

[Dingus Mungus]

I did try some experimenting with a vacuum tube the other week and I burnt it out, quite expensive to experiment with!

Not sure if relevant but this measuring coil has a coil rapped in a torroid and the end then travels round inside itself.  So we have the collector and control coil setup, but in series.  Perhaps then they are able to interact at 90 degrees in someway.  This coil is supposed to be very sensistive, so perhaps this plays a role?

So called Rogowski coil I think, use in Tokamak reactor.


Regards,


Dave.

Hmmmm interesting...
http://www.tesla-coil.com/Rogowski.htm
look at bottom graph data...