The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

[mrd10]

Hi Stefan and Dave,

Stefan, have you truncated the posts on your site, I've noticed its half what it was, I dont want to brag too much as i dont want to add to junk posts.

Dave I read the negative resistor stuff, and Jean naudins replication of it...very interesting stuff, I wonder if we introduce this neg resist idea to lc cct, or even use it in a crystal radio setup. I found sometime ago, or someone sent a link with a free running oscillator, once started with a voltage , it would continue indefinitely, after the voltage was removed, dont know if anyone got this going. maybe combining the ndr to this, might be an interesting experiment.

Cheers,

Dom   

[hartiberlin]

@Dom,
as we now have 10 postings per page the page count number is now halfed.
There are no missing postings.
@Dave,
well I find it astonishing that KOSH gets already 800 Millivolts
with his setup, as he drives his input coils only with 5 Volts !

If he would use more turns on the input coils, he probably could
get more output.

[hartiberlin]

It seems he is using a 5 Volts voltage regulator 7805 or something
like this to generate
the 5 Volts DC supply from the 12 Volts battery.
Maybe he is switching the coils also only with 5 Volts
pulses, then 800 Millivolts peek2peek output
is already pretty good for these input coils setup.

[hartiberlin]

Dom,

A negative resistance oscillator using a differential negative resistance region will not yeild any free energy.  It just means that during a certain region, resistance will drop as voltage increases, so the current remains level.

But if Chungs TRUE NEGATIVE resistance is real, where the resistance DROPS BELOW ZERO, rather than it just being a differential negative resistance, then it results in voltage in the opposite direction.  The resistor absorbs photons into the system, rather than scattering them out.  This could be good, but so far I have seen only minus 0.003 ohms or something, so this is nothing to shout about.  Chung claims minus 8 ohms by using them in series or parallel.  But Dr Chung has been ordered to keep it shut and the university will not comment on her work or even acknowledge it now.  So from this we can say its probably a real effect.  No one has yet tried using this TRUE negative resistance in an oscillator as yet, just simple DC circuits where its easy to measure the effect.

What is this oscillator that remains going after the power is removed?  If this is true, then surely it is already free energy since what is sourcing this oscillation?



Regards,

Dave.

When I remember correctly we ( Naudin and me and some other people) came to the conclusion,
that the CHUNG negative resistor was only a partial negative resistor but not a real negative
resistor power supply...
It only worked, when supply voltage was applied, so it could
not work as a free energy source.

[mrd10]

Hi Dave,

I bet they have a research facility to research the researchers...keep an eye on them so to speak.
This site would be one of them.

then they track us down like dogs and kill us.     

Dom