Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 55 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cherryman

Quote from: Omnibus on April 14, 2009, 07:07:33 PM
Now, @Cherryman, you're really sinking into this which is getting to be frightening. The MiB's are really gonna get you this time. lol.

Listen, let's first "replicate" Abeling's patent as close as possible. I'm way off at the beginning of the AutoCAD learning curve, so won't be of any help any time soon. Can you draw the wheel exactly as it is in the patent and then affix it to the barrier of your device EF2000.wm2d? That'll be a good start.

I have seen so may things come by , you will have to show me again wich of Abelings drawing you mean (He ahas a few different ones i belive?) And I will have to look if i can still find (reproduce) the EF2000 swtup.. I do so many things.. it's getting a bit disorganised.

I will see what i can do.

I don't like replication, because if the clue is there then others will notice, so i follow my own path. Sure sometimes i see things from other designs wich are usefull, but i don't really study the designs, i simply look at them and decide on instinct if it has something or not.

When creating them myself ofcourse there will be influence from what i have seen from others, but by re-inventing it myself i think i might find different approaches or angles.. and i'm stubbern!  ;D


fletcher

Quote from: Omnibus on April 14, 2009, 07:17:11 PM
@fletcher,

Where do you actually click to do that, especially to control the number of frames? Also where are the data located to export them into Excel?

<File>Import/Export     .....    <World>Accuracy>More Choices

Often if we have something of interest we build a physical model & then back engineer the sim to the same dimensions & mass values etc [or as close as reasonable] - then we adjust pin frictions etc until we get a close alignment between real & predictive sim behaviour, as a further cross reference for reliability - so far the behaviour always lines up but I put that down to his skill  ;D   !

Omnibus

@Cherryman,

Well, it's usual patentees to hide some crucial aspects of the device or the method so that they can control further negotiations through trade secrets. I don't think this case is any different. It's worth I think for the time being to have the device "replicated" in wm2d as close to the patent as possible. See attached Fig.2 from Abeling's patent and the two examples of wm2d (especially one of them) closest to the patent.

Cherryman

Okey, so you want this design with the blocks from EF2000 , i will see what i can do....

Here is a teaser to keep your mind bussy in the meantime:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPgezU4ql58&feature=channel_page

broli

If you do some force analysis you can get an idea why these ramp setups won't work. That patent is a joke. Any design that uses a ramp now is patent infringement, that's how vague his patent is and I'm pretty sure is deliberate.