Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 96 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

@AquariuZ,

Quotet is simple: the more spin, the more kinetic energy is passed on to the barrier, so when spin is created in the Abeling setup BY GRAVITY and centrifugal forces in a sufficient way the dumbbells WILL interact with the wheel upon impact.

I hope you don’t understand this in a sense that upon impact the spinning ball possess more kinetic energy than the ball not spinning. The well-established physical truth in the situation of this simulation is that the total sum of translational kinetic energy and the rotational energy (plus the heat losses) must be equal to the gravitational potential energy the ball had at the apex. If the program shows otherwise, it’s a flaw in the program and not a new discovery.

In this sense, it isn’t true that the more spin the more kinetic energy is passed on to the barrier. If you think the program is showing otherwise it’s an error in the program.

What may differ probably is the resultant velocity induced on the body being impacted upon after the impact by the moving body â€" the magnitude and direction of that velocity while preserving the amount of the total energy. I don’t see, however, how this will solve the problem of closing the loop in Abeling’s device.

hansvonlieven

When you guys are talking about spin combined with a drop maybe you should be looking at something like a Yo-Yo.

Just a thought

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

AB Hammer

Quote from: hansvonlieven on April 16, 2009, 05:15:15 PM
When you guys are talking about spin combined with a drop maybe you should be looking at something like a Yo-Yo.

Just a thought

Hans von Lieven

Hans

Water wheels have spin combined with drop.

With out a dream, there can be no vision.

Alan

hansvonlieven

No Alan, they don't.

The drop causes rotation in a separate device in a water wheel. In a Yo-Yo the drop actually causes the weight to rotate as it unwinds from the string. Different thing altogether.

Hans von Lieven
When all is said and done, more is said than done.     Groucho Marx

AB Hammer

OK Hans

I stand corrected, I was thinking out of context. :-[ LOL
With out a dream, there can be no vision.

Alan