Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[LarryC]

Sense of rotation is the least of our worries.

Oh, damm, I must have missed the earlier Omnibus ignore the inventor memo, since the patent and the inventor states the rotational direction is extremely important.

Regards, Larry

[Omnibus]

Oh, damm, I must have missed the earlier Omnibus ignore the inventor memo, since the patent and the inventor states the rotational direction is extremely important.

Regards, Larry

No it isn't. It's what it naturally is, nothing more than that.

[LarryC]

@All,

Analyzing Sjack statements: ‘Due to the invention of the dual lifting system, the falling/pushing weight will hardly be hindered by the weight that has to be lifted.’
and ‘Extra force is generated in the lower left of the system’

In FIG 4, weight 3-7 is starting to lift. The angle between the oval guide and the horizon is 30 degrees and the curved radial guide is perpendicular to the oval guide.

This would be considered an inclined plane and the weight force would be distributed so that 50% would be against the curved radial guide and 87% on the oval guide.

Weight 3-8 has an angle between the oval guide and the horizon is 45 degrees. The weight force would be distributed so that 71% would be against the curved radial guide and 71% on the oval guide.

Weight 3-9 has an angle between the oval guide and the horizon of 60 degrees. The weight force would be distributed so that 87% would be against the curved radial guide and 50% on the oval guide. 

The dual lifting system may be the combination of using the fixed oval guide and the curved radial guide to share the lift requirement. As this is playing out the lever advantage is increasing with each movement. By 3-10 it is around 2 to 1.


From the patent: ‘A constructive implementation of the simple conversion device is obtained when the guide means at least one placed next to the carrier, is essentially parallel to the plane or rotary motion include extended ring, which the weight of each motion.’ This is hard to understand due to the translation, but it may be emphasizing the need to be parallel to the oval guide and perpendicular to the curved radial guide.

The fact that the oval guide is perpendicular to curved radial guides is very interesting. I had tested a similar inclined plane previous but it did not run because it did not stay perpendicular and the decrease in angle caused a pinching effort which stopped the unit.

Also, Dusty had a problem with the hockey sticks guides due to pinching effort in the lower left. They did not stay perpendicular to the oval guide.  I think that the hockey sticks need a different radial guide design to maintain the perpendicular orientation in the lower left quadrant.

Regards, Larry

[ruggero]

The angle between the oval guide and the horizon is 30 degrees and the curved radial guide is perpendicular to the oval guide.

This would be considered an inclined plane and the weight force would be distributed so that 50% would be against the curved radial guide and 87% on the oval guide....

Larry,

Is this what other prefer to call "grooves"?

ruggero

[LarryC]

Larry,

Is this what other prefer to call "grooves"?

ruggero

Yes, sorry about the confusion, I was using the name from the short patent translation that had the figure drawings.

Regards, Larry