Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

Started by AquariuZ, April 03, 2009, 01:17:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 34 Guests are viewing this topic.

LarryC

@All,

In case anyone would like to create a template from points off of Fig 4 of the patent, please see the attachments. A spreadsheet is displayed first with the points scaled off of Fig 4. The two drawing were made using the points. The excel data set is last. Just change the 610 (MM) in blue to whatever radius you wish.

I know Fig 4 is not perfect, but it is as close as you can get to what the inventor proposed. I had to adjust it slightly to get the outer circle within a fortieth of an inch. The guiding stand is a non-symmetrical oval according to Fig 4. Print Fig 4 and trace the oval if you wish to confirm.

Notice the smooth inward change to center in the lower to middle left and the explosive outward change in the upper left on the last column of the spreadsheet.

If only one set of weights were used with this setup then only momentum could get you thru the upper left to receive the needed CW rotational impact at the end of the acceleration phase. It seems that more than one set would be required to add additional leverage and momentum.

Regards, Larry 

ruggero

Very Nice - Thanks LarryC

Maybe you could expand the template by looking at the "Angle of Attack"...especially from 14.0 to 15.5 it have a dramatic change in angle.

ruggero

AquariuZ

Quote from: LarryC on May 09, 2009, 09:58:22 AM
@All,

In case anyone would like to create a template from points off of Fig 4 of the patent, please see the attachments. A spreadsheet is displayed first with the points scaled off of Fig 4. The two drawing were made using the points. The excel data set is last. Just change the 610 (MM) in blue to whatever radius you wish.

I know Fig 4 is not perfect, but it is as close as you can get to what the inventor proposed. I had to adjust it slightly to get the outer circle within a fortieth of an inch. The guiding stand is a non-symmetrical oval according to Fig 4. Print Fig 4 and trace the oval if you wish to confirm.

Notice the smooth inward change to center in the lower to middle left and the explosive outward change in the upper left on the last column of the spreadsheet.

If only one set of weights were used with this setup then only momentum could get you thru the upper left to receive the needed CW rotational impact at the end of the acceleration phase. It seems that more than one set would be required to add additional leverage and momentum.

Regards, Larry

Outstanding!

eisenficker2000

I love to see the results off Dusty's new model..

I have become a bit sceptic, after fiddling around with my own model.

The picture is from the "equilibrium" position..I doubt if more weights do make a change...

I have an tilted avi, but it practically only shows the wheel returning to its "steady state"

Omnibus

@eisenficker2000,

Good job. Never mind skepticism, if that's engineered correctly it should work (friction is the culprit). Let's get some data to see how the center of mass is positioned vs. the axle -- what are the weights of your parts, diameter of wheel etc.? Emotions are not friends of objective research.

EDIT: Also, place all 8 weights. It isn't to be assumed they play no role.