Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[AB Hammer]

@Cloxxki,

Rate of rise doesn't make one bit of a difference. What matters is the persistent discrepancy between the center of mass and the axis of rotation -- center of mass is always to the right of the axle at all the angles of rotation of the wheel. That's a gicen (called here OU property). The problem is to decrease friction below a level where this fixed OU property can show itself.

Omnibus

Why do you think so limited? When you have a device/wheel that can easily overcome friction. Then the reduction of friction can be pursued to make it run smoother. If you are only trying to get past the friction by fine adjustments, you will not get what you should.

Alan

[Omnibus]

Omnibus

Why do you think so limited? When you have a device/wheel that can easily overcome friction. Then the reduction of friction can be pursued to make it run smoother. If you are only trying to get past the friction by fine adjustments, you will not get what you should.

Alan

Easier said than done. Reducing friction is a real constructive challenge.

[rlortie]

I believe that what Alan is stating is; why are you so intent about finite friction problems. If the wheel is that sensitive to being a runner  what good would it be for utilization of free energy?  Another concept of the drinking bird is not of value. 

Face the facts; To date no one has objectively proven that Sabling's design is viable. No builders have come forward stating 'I have a runner',  yet many have tried.

Ralph

http://arracheenterprise.web.officelive.com/default.aspx

 

[ramset]

Alan said
Quote:
"When you have a device/wheel that can easily overcome friction."
end quote

That would be nice!! [Very nice]

Chet

[Omnibus]

@rlortie,

If the wheel is that sensitive to being a runner  what good would it be for utilization of free energy?

Show me a runner as sensitive as you can imagine but turning on its own and leave its utilization to me.