Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel and the Worlds first Weight Power Plant

[Omnibus]

Now the Sjack Abeling Gravity Wheel show an almost strait up ramp. Those who have tried it don't seem to get past the ramp. Is there any body else besides the claim of the inventor and his supporters that has any proof?

Michael

I showed earlier in the thread results for the net torque (sum of all eight torques) at every 5 degree rotation increment and the net torque value without exception was negative (clockwise rotation).

Also, I showed earlier that for any degree of rotation of the wheel the center of mass remains persistently sideways of the axis of rotation (to the right of the axle). This means that at any angle of rotation of the wheel there is a violation of the lever rule causing persistent clockwise rotation.

The above proves that the wheel in question is and OU wheel. The mentioned studies were carried out for several shapes of the ramps and while some shapes showed better results than others OU was present with all ramps.

[grayone]

I showed earlier in the thread results for the net torque (sum of all eight torques) at every 5 degree rotation increment and the net torque value without exception was negative (clockwise rotation).

Also, I showed earlier that for any degree of rotation of the wheel the center of mass remains persistently sideways of the axis of rotation (to the right of the axle). This means that at any angle of rotation of the wheel there is a violation of the lever rule causing persistent clockwise rotation.

The above proves that the wheel in question is and OU wheel. The mentioned studies were carried out for several shapes of the ramps and while some shapes showed better results than others OU was present with all ramps.

Omnibus; Well then show a running wheel then. I have not seen a Sjack Abeling type Gravity Wheel run from anybody. As my mom say the proof is in the pudding. Crunching numbers does not prove OU.

[Omnibus]

Omnibus; Well then show a running wheel then. I have not seen a Sjack Abeling type Gravity Wheel run from anybody. As my mom say the proof is in the pudding. Crunching numbers does not prove OU.

Proof is in the pudding says your mom, scientists say other things. Scientists use the scientific method and it includes theoretical analysis.

[grayone]

Proof is in the pudding says your mom, scientists say other things. Scientists use the scientific method and it includes theoretical analysis.

Theoretical analysis, is not proof. It is theory. When one is running and not stopping on its own. Then and only then is it proof, and not theory.

[Omnibus]

Theoretical analysis, is not proof. It is theory. When one is running and not stopping on its own. Then and only then is it proof, and not theory.

In principle it isn't bad to have an opinion, as we all see from the above you do. In the matters of science, however, it isn't enough. More is needed.