Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Are Tommey Reed´s pulse motor circuits overunity ?

Started by powercat, April 13, 2009, 06:40:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 16 Guests are viewing this topic.

chrisC

Quote from: bolt on April 27, 2009, 11:18:37 PM
....

Looping is an entire new problem due to impeadance matching networks are usually lossy and kill the last bit of OU.  That is why easier to show i/p power to separate o/p. Not as simple as putting a wire from out to in.



Hi Bolt:
Thanks for the timely information. Any idea or reference on how best to close the loop seeing the apparent efficiency is high enough to allow further losses in order to successfully close the loop?

cheers
chrisC

bolt

To loop means as a Bearden expression "don't kill the dipole". In practice it usually means hi Q resonance output stage almost always hi impeadance needs transforming to low impeadance variable hi current battery load where battery at RF concept has many problems. Its a capacitor but its also reactive to high frequency plus has low DC internal resistance! Variables change as battery charges becomes a varactor. At best requires precision transformer ratios to match OU o/p to battery then looping requires low impedance to system impeadance matching. This sometimes requires converting DC back to AC through inverters.

Its a tough cookie but don't get strung up about looping. OU end to end is of far more benefit where solar, wind or low energy grid can be transformed to a  hi energy low loss system.

Remember Tesla principles everything works in resonance and OU is only transformation of energy from one state to another.

wattsup

What if the output goes to a toroidal transformer primary that has two secondaries, send one back and use the other.

Earl

@Groundloop

In this case, the best impedance matcher would be a DC/DC converter.

Earl

Groundloop said:
I have modified my test circuit with a hexfet (IRF840) instead of a regular transistor (2N3055).
It seems that I can not loop the output directly back to the input because the internal resistance of the lead acid battery is so low that it is a short circuit for the captured back emf.

So if we want to do a full looped back test circuit then we will need a impedance match at the output and to the input.
"It is through science that we prove, but through intuition that we discover." - H. Poincare

"Most of all, start every day asking yourself what you will do today to make the world a better place to live in."  Mark Snoswell

"As we look ahead, we have an expression in Shell, which we like to use, and that is just as the Stone Age did not end for the lack of rocks, the oil and gas age will not end for the lack oil and gas, but rather technology will move us forward." John Hofmeister, president Shell Oil Company

hartiberlin

Quote from: Groundloop on April 27, 2009, 06:46:45 PM
Stefan,

He has a big capacitor bank in parallel with the batteries. He also have a big capacitor bank
at the output of his coil switch.

Quote: "it seems you have missed the principle behind it."

No I have not.

Attached is a drawing of TR's circuit. The power input is from his battery bank. The single
input capacitor in the drawing represent the input capacitor bank. The single mosfet represent his four paralleled mosfet transistors. The single output capacitor in the drawing represent the output capacitor bank. This drawing was displayed in one of his YouTube videos. Are you saying that this drawing is not correct?

Groundloop.

Groundloop,
I am sorry,
yes, you are right.
I mixed up something.

Yes, the current and not the voltage is the value, that is chopped,
and being averaged in his design.
But that is already measured by his ampmeter.
So yes, you were right. I am really sorry, that I mixed this up.

Tommey really needs to do current measurements on a shunt
or via lowpassfilter at the battery source, otherwise his meters
will not really show what is going on.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum